Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

AURORA AF HELSINGBORG

IMO: 9007128
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Helsingborg
Technical efficiency: EEDI 36.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Oresundslinjen Helsingborg AB

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

63.2

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,575

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (+110%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

178

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (−18%)

Average speed

8.0 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−49%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,526 t

CO₂ emitted

8,098 t

Distance sailed

39,957 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,988 h

208 days, 57% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 28.6 kg/nm · median 150 (−81%)

69.3Ranks 7 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 8.6 kn · median 15.8 (−46%)

12.0Faster than 2% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 331 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−42%)

66.8Ranks 152 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 43.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−83%)

48.6Ranks 35 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

898 t

11.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AURORA AF HELSINGBORG
Ro-pax median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AURORA AF HELSINGBORG
Ro-pax median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

AURORA AF HELSINGBORG
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

AURORA AF HELSINGBORG
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	+13%	+23%	+8%	−13%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+73%	+71%	−6%	+87%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 73%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+33%	+33%	+1%	+32%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+62%	+62%	−3%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 62%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−89%	−89%	+4%	−91%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 89%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+105%	+97%	−5%	+233%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 105%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−64%	−64%	+8%	−64%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 64%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Oresundslinjen Helsingborg AB	1,192	3,821	41,657	4,818	8.6	28.6	–	–
2024	Oresundslinjen Helsingborg AB	970	3,109	38,486	4,805	8.0	25.2	–	–
2023	not published	595	1,907	40,879	5,103	8.0	14.6	–	–
2022	not published	443	1,419	40,317	5,033	8.0	11.0	–	–
2021	not published	282	903	41,522	5,184	8.0	6.80	–	–
2020	not published	2,526	8,098	39,957	4,988	8.0	63.2	–	–
2019	not published	1,302	4,176	42,231	5,008	8.4	30.8	–	–
2018	not published	3,309	10,609	38,967	4,621	8.4	84.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Oresundslinjen Helsingborg AB	331	567	−42%	152 of 408	43.6	253	−83%	Verifavia	A+C
2024	Oresundslinjen Helsingborg AB	378	547	−31%	159 of 404	47.8	233	−79%	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	202	680	−70%	96 of 386	27.9	234	−88%	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	153	626	−76%	89 of 394	19.4	253	−92%	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	138	815	−83%	81 of 377	12.1	226	−95%	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	1,575	751	+110%	296 of 387	178	217	−18%	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	473	569	−17%	174 of 394	65.9	223	−70%	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	1,327	729	+82%	258 of 361	181	184	−1%	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.