Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

FINNPARTNER

IMO: 9010163
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: MalmÖ
Technical efficiency: EIV 4.34 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Finnlines Ship Management AB · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

146

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

72.6

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (−90%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

138

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (−37%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,433 t

CO₂ emitted

42,391 t

Distance sailed

92,156 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,936 h

247 days, 68% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 151 kg/nm · median 150 (+1%)

69.3Ranks 207 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 15.8 (−3%)

12.0Faster than 42% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 90.5 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−84%)

66.8Ranks 64 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 143 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−44%)

48.6Ranks 137 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,382 t

5.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FINNPARTNER
Ro-pax median

130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FINNPARTNER
Ro-pax median

15.015.516.016.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

FINNPARTNER
Ro-pax median

100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

FINNPARTNER
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−5%	−6%	+1%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+6%	+7%	+16%	+57%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−3%	−2%	−12%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+2%	+1%	−7%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+4%	+4%	−1%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+5%	+4%	+2%	−38%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−1%	+2%	+1%	+62%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Finnlines Ship Management AB	13,211	41,577	87,378	5,715	15.3	151	–	–
2024	Finnlines Ship Management AB	13,874	43,413	86,869	5,613	15.5	160	–	–
2023	not published	11,326	35,651	75,036	4,889	15.3	151	–	–
2022	not published	13,185	41,615	85,052	5,556	15.3	155	–	–
2021	not published	13,855	43,726	91,337	5,885	15.5	152	–	–
2020	not published	13,433	42,391	92,156	5,936	15.5	146	–	–
2019	not published	12,623	39,835	90,563	5,811	15.6	139	–	–
2018	not published	12,549	39,602	89,279	5,915	15.1	141	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Finnlines Ship Management AB	90.5	567	−84%	64 of 408	143	253	−44%	RINA	C
2024	Finnlines Ship Management AB	83.0	547	−85%	57 of 404	140	233	−40%	RINA	B+C
2023	not published	52.8	680	−92%	27 of 386	125	234	−47%	RINA	C
2022	not published	60.4	626	−90%	32 of 394	121	253	−52%	RINA	A+B
2021	not published	70.2	815	−91%	45 of 377	126	226	−44%	RINA	–
2020	not published	72.6	751	−90%	54 of 387	138	217	−37%	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	118	569	−79%	84 of 394	117	223	−47%	RINA	A+B
2018	not published	72.5	729	−90%	58 of 361	122	184	−34%	RINA	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.