Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

DENIA CIUTAT CREATIVA

IMO: 9019054
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3,099.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

98.1

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−36%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

504

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

196

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−16%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,979 t

CO₂ emitted

21,826 t

Distance sailed

71,142 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,857 h

202 days, 55% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 101 kg/nm · median 150 (−33%)

69.3Ranks 95 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 15.8 (−3%)

12.0Faster than 43% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 168 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−70%)

66.8Ranks 111 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 203 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−20%)

48.6Ranks 178 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports70%
From the EU13%
Into the EU11%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,417 t

6.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DENIA CIUTAT CREATIVA
Ro-pax median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DENIA CIUTAT CREATIVA
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

DENIA CIUTAT CREATIVA
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

DENIA CIUTAT CREATIVA
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.8 kn	−1%	+21%	+6%	−78%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.0 kn	+4%	−11%	−20%	+50%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	+1%	+2%	+39%	+30%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+2.0 kn	−13%	+1%	+41%	−59%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+15%	+8%	−32%	−21%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	−8%	−19%	−31%	−78%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.6 kn	+7%	−4%	+7%	−25%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	6,114	19,133	60,686	3,949	15.4	101	–	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	5,820	18,197	57,268	4,548	12.6	102	–	–
2023	not published	6,979	21,826	71,142	4,857	14.6	98.1	–	–
2022	not published	4,996	15,636	51,358	3,535	14.5	97.3	–	–
2021	not published	4,097	12,860	36,435	2,925	12.5	112	–	–
2020	not published	5,237	16,402	53,621	4,057	13.2	97.7	–	–
2019	not published	8,191	25,640	77,330	5,142	15.0	106	–	–
2018	not published	7,208	22,537	72,514	4,362	16.6	99.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	168	567	−70%	111 of 408	203	253	−20%	RINA	A+B
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	754	547	+38%	250 of 404	390	233	+67%	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	504	680	−26%	155 of 386	196	234	−16%	RINA	–
2022	not published	387	626	−38%	147 of 394	190	253	−25%	RINA	B
2021	not published	934	815	+15%	205 of 377	189	226	−17%	RINA	B
2020	not published	1,177	751	+57%	248 of 387	332	217	+52%	RINA	B
2019	not published	5,348	569	+840%	383 of 394	5,348	223	+2,303%	RINA	B
2018	not published	7,090	729	+873%	353 of 361	7,088	184	+3,751%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.