Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

LIDER PRESTIJ

IMO: 9019066
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Kribi
Technical efficiency: EEXI 28.75 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BENIAMINO CARNEVALE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SAMSUN SHIPPING LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

86.6 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

–

g CO₂/pax·nm

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

179

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

11.6 kn

Fuel per day at sea

24.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,088 t

CO₂ emitted

3,396 t

3,449 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

12,558 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,086 h

45 days, 12% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2020

Set against all 387 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 99.2 kg/nm · median 156.6 (−37%)

84.3Ranks 69 of 387, lowest first246.0

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 15.8 (−6%)

12.3Faster than 37% of ro-pax ships21.7

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 7,642.79 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 750.91 (+918%)

38.61Ranks 378 of 387, lowest first2,528.70

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 124.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 217.49 (−43%)

38.11Ranks 125 of 387, lowest first1,074.81

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU43%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,755 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LIDER PRESTIJ
Ro-pax median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

LIDER PRESTIJ
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

LIDER PRESTIJ
Ro-pax median

100125150175200225

’182018’192019’202020

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

LIDER PRESTIJ
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’182018’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2025	−0.8 kn	−59%	−62%	+1,433%	–	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 59%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	+108%	+83%	−99%	–	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 108%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+2%	−4%	−17%	–	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−5%	−4%	+13%	+189%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−3%	−6%	+3%	−29%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	SAMSUN SHIPPING LTD.	1,088	3,396	12,558	1,086	11.6	86.6	–	–
2022	not published	173	544	819	66	12.4	210.8	–	–
2021	not published	5,823	18,182	57,464	4,079	14.1	101.3	–	–
2020	not published	6,905	21,560	69,577	4,656	14.9	99.2	–	–
2019	not published	6,417	20,048	61,428	4,175	14.7	104.5	–	–
2018	not published	6,442	20,130	59,922	3,952	15.2	107.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	SAMSUN SHIPPING LTD.	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2020	not published	7,642.79	750.91	+918%	378 of 387	124.39	217.49	−43%	RINA	A
2019	not published	2,647.81	569.03	+365%	374 of 394	133.18	222.56	−40%	RINA	A
2018	not published	3,726.27	728.92	+411%	334 of 361	199.18	184.05	+8%	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.