Navalyze · Container · Ship

MARTINE A

IMO: 9020340
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 1,628 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,782 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

96.5

Container median 182 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

52.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+158%)

Average speed

8.2 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−41%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,921 t

CO₂ emitted

12,242 t

Distance sailed

40,615 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,930 h

205 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 86.9 kg/nm · median 167 (−48%)

78.9Ranks 351 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 13.5 (−33%)

9.6Faster than 8% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 58.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (+234%)

7.33Ranks 1,842 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports54%
From the EU20%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

599 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARTINE A
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARTINE A
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MARTINE A
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	−1%	+14%	−17%	–	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+9%	+15%	−71%	−1%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−2.9 kn	+11%	−18%	+117%	+21%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+2.2 kn	−10%	+10%	+110%	−3%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.6 kn	−14%	+38%	−82%	+16%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.4 kn	−3%	−31%	−67%	−17%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	220	691	2,557	243	10.5	86.2	166	–
2024	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	268	847	3,086	338	9.1	86.9	58.5	–
2023	not published	849	2,680	10,685	1,234	8.7	79.4	58.9	–
2022	not published	353	1,104	4,915	423	11.6	71.8	48.9	–
2020	not published	188	586	2,346	250	9.4	80.2	50.5	–
2019	not published	1,257	3,921	13,390	2,304	5.8	93.8	43.3	–
2018	not published	3,921	12,242	40,615	4,930	8.2	96.5	52.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	58.5	17.5	+234%	1,842 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	58.9	19.4	+204%	1,776 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	48.9	19.1	+155%	1,591 of 1,825	DNV	A
2020	not published	50.5	17.6	+187%	1,607 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	43.3	18.9	+130%	1,473 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	52.1	20.2	+158%	1,512 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.