Navalyze · Container · Ship

INGA A

IMO: 9020352
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,629 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NATALIA A

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,413 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

85.6

Container median 182 kg/nm (−53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

49.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+144%)

Average speed

8.6 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−38%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,145 t

CO₂ emitted

9,824 t

Distance sailed

36,755 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,258 h

177 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 119 kg/nm · median 177 (−33%)

78.8Ranks 698 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 6.6 kn · median 13.3 (−50%)

9.1Faster than 3% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 80.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+395%)

7.22Ranks 2,190 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU39%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

405 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

INGA A
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

INGA A
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

INGA A
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.5 kn	+27%	+4%	+317%	–	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	−0.3 kn	+16%	+12%	−22%	–	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	−7%	−25%	+520%	+146%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	+33%	+16%	−72%	−40%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.0 kn	−28%	+9%	+336%	−14%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+6%	−3%	−99%	+52%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	1,417	4,463	11,947	1,798	6.6	119	80.7	–
2024	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	267	836	2,865	352	8.1	93.3	139	–
2022	not published	295	932	3,659	437	8.4	80.7	94.3	–
2021	not published	51	160	590	57	10.4	86.7	38.4	–
2020	not published	135	422	2,072	174	11.9	65.4	64.2	–
2019	not published	43	134	475	60	7.9	90.7	74.9	–
2018	not published	3,145	9,824	36,755	4,258	8.6	85.6	49.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	80.7	16.3	+395%	2,190 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2022	not published	94.3	19.1	+393%	1,812 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	38.4	17.9	+114%	1,459 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	64.2	17.6	+265%	1,713 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	74.9	18.9	+297%	1,734 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	49.4	20.2	+144%	1,475 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.