Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

ZADAR

IMO
9021485
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Rijeka
Technical efficiency
EEXI 56.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Jadrolinija Rijeka

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
82.9 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−45%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
40.16
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−93%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
294
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+16%)
Average speed
13.1 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−17%)
Fuel per day at sea
26.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,950 t
CO₂ emitted
9,459 t
9,604 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
35,573 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,715 h
113 days, 31% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 82.9 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−45%)
69.3Ranks 65 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 15.8 (−17%)
12.0Faster than 18% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 40.16 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−93%)
66.76Ranks 15 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 293.73 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+16%)
48.59Ranks 216 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports76%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU24%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
23.6%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • ZADAR
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • ZADAR
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ZADAR
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • ZADAR
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+2.8 kn−0%+27%−5%–2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−3.1 kn+5%−20%−6%–3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+1.3 kn−4%+7%+9%–1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−1.2 kn+4%−6%−17%–1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.3 kn−11%−2%+19%–1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.5 kn+3%−2%+19%−41%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.4 kn+7%+10%−8%+21%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Jadrolinija Rijeka2,9509,45935,5732,71513.182.9––
2024Jadrolinija3,12310,01337,5383,65910.383.2––
2023not published3,14410,08039,7452,95713.479.1––
2022not published3,0109,65036,5513,01712.182.3––
2021not published3,49711,21143,9873,31813.379.5––
2020not published3,31310,62237,0623,08112.089.4––
2019not published2,7138,69831,1422,49012.587.1––
2018not published2,7508,81633,6962,77812.181.6––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Jadrolinija Rijeka40.16566.51−93%15 of 408293.73253.18+16%VerifaviaB
2024Jadrolinija–––––––VerifaviaB
2023not published–––––––VerifaviaB
2022not published–––––––VerifaviaB
2021not published–––––––CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPINGB
2020not published0.84750.91−100%11 of 3870.25217.49−100%CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPINGB
2019not published1.43569.03−100%13 of 3940.51222.56−100%CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPINGB
2018not published1.18728.92−100%8 of 3610.42184.05−100%CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPINGB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

ZADAR (IMO 9021485): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze