Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

ITALIA STREAM

IMO: 9030137
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 3,367 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ITALIA REEFER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seatrade Groningen B.V. · part of Seatrade

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,864 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

114

Reefer median 82.8 kg/nm (+37%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

72.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 59.1 (+23%)

Average speed

17.1 kn

Reefer median 15.6 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

46.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,664 t

CO₂ emitted

36,345 t

Distance sailed

102,620 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,993 h

250 days, 68% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 99.1 kg/nm · median 82.9 (+20%)

55.8Ranks 89 of 109, lowest first118

Average speedThis ship 14.3 kn · median 14.6 (−2%)

8.2Faster than 45% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 91.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.8 (+62%)

36.7Ranks 91 of 109, lowest first140

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports44%
From the EU8%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

963 t

2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ITALIA STREAM
Reefer median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ITALIA STREAM
Reefer median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ITALIA STREAM
Reefer median

40.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.3 kn	−1%	+8%	+67%	+32%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.0 kn	+1%	−12%	−30%	+51%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+5%	+1%	+79%	−54%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−15%	−22%	−38%	+40%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−2%	−4%	−72%	−1%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−9%	−11%	+101%	−11%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.2 kn	+8%	+15%	−7%	+27%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Seatrade Groningen B.V.	3,700	11,547	37,345	2,617	14.3	99.1	91.8	–
2024	Seatrade Groningen B.V.	2,240	7,010	22,347	1,719	13.0	100	69.3	–
2023	not published	3,144	9,838	31,797	2,124	15.0	98.9	45.9	–
2022	not published	1,670	5,209	17,717	1,145	15.5	94.2	101	–
2021	not published	3,153	9,833	28,445	1,697	16.8	111	71.9	–
2020	not published	11,664	36,345	102,620	5,993	17.1	114	72.8	–
2019	not published	6,374	19,884	50,978	2,920	17.5	125	81.5	–
2018	not published	6,338	19,775	54,603	3,353	16.3	116	64.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Seatrade Groningen B.V.	91.8	56.8	+62%	91 of 109	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Seatrade Groningen B.V.	69.3	58.7	+18%	72 of 108	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	45.9	55.6	−17%	36 of 135	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2022	not published	101	55.3	+82%	129 of 143	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	71.9	55.0	+31%	126 of 158	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	72.8	59.1	+23%	101 of 149	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	81.5	62.6	+30%	106 of 147	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	64.3	72.8	−12%	52 of 136	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.