Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ERNA SU

IMO: 9037290
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.65 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: VAT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: EGES SHIPPING LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

45.5 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

29.50

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+16%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,019 t

CO₂ emitted

3,243 t

3,293 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,380 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,163 h

90 days, 25% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 45.5 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+29%)

17.4Ranks 1,759 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 9.3 (+11%)

7.0Faster than 70% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 29.50 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+16%)

10.14Ranks 1,707 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports37%
From the EU22%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU11%

74% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,387 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ERNA SU
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ERNA SU
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ERNA SU
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+17%	+26%	+20%	+50%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−14%	−20%	+17%	−70%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+16%	+22%	+170%	+348%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+12%	+1%	−71%	−8%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.5 kn	+7%	+24%	+45%	+5%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	−20%	−5%	−56%	−8%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−10%	−12%	+17%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	EGES SHIPPING LTD.	1,019	3,243	22,380	2,163	10.3	45.5	–	–
2024	EGES SHIPPING LTD.	725	2,289	18,631	1,940	9.6	38.9	–	–
2023	not published	717	2,266	15,927	1,526	10.4	45.0	–	–
2022	not published	229	724	5,897	590	10.0	38.8	–	–
2021	not published	717	2,256	20,654	1,881	11.0	34.7	–	–
2020	not published	462	1,475	14,233	1,496	9.5	32.5	–	–
2019	not published	1,316	4,115	32,419	4,026	8.1	40.6	–	–
2018	not published	1,239	3,869	27,611	3,349	8.2	44.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	EGES SHIPPING LTD.	29.50	25.45	+16%	1,707 of 2,706	Verifavia	A
2024	EGES SHIPPING LTD.	19.71	19.25	+2%	579 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	66.08	20.67	+220%	1,014 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	14.75	21.57	−32%	259 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	16.04	22.70	−29%	255 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	15.24	24.50	−38%	193 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	16.60	24.96	−33%	225 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	19.08	24.89	−23%	310 of 1,044	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.