Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

CS CIHAN

IMO: 9045704
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.04 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ARMADOR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI TIC.LTD.STI (5605458)

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

36.3

General cargo median 58.4 kg/nm (−38%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

20.7

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.9 (−17%)

Average speed

6.3 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (−35%)

Fuel per day at sea

5.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

875 t

CO₂ emitted

2,735 t

Distance sailed

24,129 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,838 h

160 days, 44% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 47.3 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+34%)

17.4Ranks 1,830 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 9.3 (+9%)

6.9Faster than 65% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 36.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+43%)

10.2Ranks 2,094 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU47%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

113 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CS CIHAN
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CS CIHAN
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

CS CIHAN
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+3%	+4%	+16%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+20%	+12%	+20%	+24%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−8%	−4%	+54%	+14%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+20%	+16%	−78%	+43%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	+4%	+13%	+106%	+4%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.6 kn	−13%	+39%	−16%	−17%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+6%	+2%	−3%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ARMADOR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI TIC.LTD.STI (5605458)	929	2,951	19,624	1,952	10.1	47.3	–	–
2024	ARMADOR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI TIC.LTD.STI (5605458)	778	2,459	16,928	1,703	9.9	46.0	–	–
2023	not published	539	1,703	14,082	1,325	10.6	38.3	–	–
2022	not published	379	1,194	9,129	897	10.2	41.6	–	–
2021	not published	1,416	4,453	40,758	3,850	10.6	34.8	–	–
2020	not published	665	2,115	19,787	2,052	9.6	33.6	–	–
2019	not published	905	2,834	23,435	3,887	6.0	38.6	–	–
2018	not published	875	2,735	24,129	3,838	6.3	36.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ARMADOR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI TIC.LTD.STI (5605458)	36.4	25.5	+43%	2,094 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	ARMADOR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI TIC.LTD.STI (5605458)	40.2	19.3	+109%	1,003 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	32.3	20.7	+56%	869 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	28.3	21.6	+31%	731 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	19.8	22.7	−13%	428 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	18.9	24.5	−23%	315 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	22.9	25.0	−8%	477 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	20.7	24.9	−17%	367 of 1,044	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.