Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

BOW FAGUS

IMO: 9047764
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 14,525 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.84 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Odfjell Management AS

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,525 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

84.9 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 80.8 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.34

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.73 (+10%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.0 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,280 t

CO₂ emitted

7,157 t

7,269 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

26,868 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,085 h

87 days, 24% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 84.9 kg/nm · median 80.8 (+5%)

53.8Ranks 719 of 1,274, lowest first110.8

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 11.0 (+17%)

8.7Faster than 96% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.73 (+10%)

8.47Ranks 710 of 1,274, lowest first41.97

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU51%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU6%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,896 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BOW FAGUS
Chemical tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

BOW FAGUS
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BOW FAGUS
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−16%	−15%	+243%	+35%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	−1%	+12%	−74%	+3%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−17%	−18%	+226%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+8%	+3%	−54%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	+15%	+33%	−29%	+7%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	+53%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Odfjell Management AS	2,280	7,157	26,868	2,085	12.9	84.9	18.34	–
2023	not published	796	2,529	7,836	617	12.7	101.5	13.55	–
2022	not published	3,048	9,658	29,696	2,640	11.2	102.7	13.15	–
2021	not published	1,124	3,560	9,121	804	11.3	123.2	13.23	–
2020	not published	2,267	7,191	19,920	1,667	12.0	113.8	13.33	–
2019	not published	2,787	8,753	28,217	2,723	10.4	98.8	12.42	–
2018	not published	1,843	5,777	18,401	1,780	10.3	100.2	10.73	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Odfjell Management AS	18.34	16.73	+10%	710 of 1,274	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	13.55	16.23	−17%	477 of 1,314	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	13.15	16.06	−18%	489 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	13.23	16.69	−21%	428 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	13.33	16.16	−18%	429 of 1,312	DNV	B
2019	not published	12.42	17.32	−28%	343 of 1,321	DNV	B
2018	not published	10.73	17.14	−37%	217 of 1,294	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.