Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

FEGULUS

IMO: 9055709
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 3,940 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seatrade Groningen B.V. · part of Seatrade

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,300 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

73.8

Reefer median 87.9 kg/nm (−16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

100

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 62.6 (+60%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Reefer median 15.2 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,250 t

CO₂ emitted

10,159 t

Distance sailed

44,051 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,591 h

108 days, 30% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 82.7 kg/nm · median 82.9 (−0%)

55.8Ranks 53 of 109, lowest first118

Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 14.6 (−43%)

8.2Faster than 11% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 66.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.8 (+16%)

36.7Ranks 73 of 109, lowest first140

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU25%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

133 t

1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FEGULUS
Reefer median

60.070.080.090.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FEGULUS
Reefer median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FEGULUS
Reefer median

50.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.0 kn	+15%	−7%	−6%	−23%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−5.0 kn	+11%	−25%	−35%	−35%	5.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−12%	−16%	+5%	+92%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−8%	−6%	+71%	+11%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+8%	+9%	−27%	−31%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.3 kn	+1%	−7%	−52%	−9%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	+3%	+9%	+65%	−40%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Seatrade Groningen B.V.	1,388	4,377	16,791	2,014	8.3	82.7	66.2	–
2024	Seatrade Groningen B.V.	1,292	4,050	17,884	1,738	10.3	72.2	86.3	–
2023	not published	1,802	5,651	27,717	1,818	15.3	65.0	133	–
2022	not published	1,967	6,152	26,508	1,657	16.0	74.2	69.7	–
2021	not published	1,252	3,910	15,532	988	15.7	80.6	62.8	–
2020	not published	1,586	4,970	21,344	1,362	15.7	74.3	91.1	–
2019	not published	3,250	10,159	44,051	2,591	17.0	73.8	100	–
2018	not published	1,914	5,965	26,625	1,666	16.0	71.9	166	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Seatrade Groningen B.V.	66.2	56.8	+16%	73 of 109	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Seatrade Groningen B.V.	86.3	58.7	+47%	87 of 108	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	133	55.6	+140%	131 of 135	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2022	not published	69.7	55.3	+26%	103 of 143	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	62.8	55.0	+14%	102 of 158	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	91.1	59.1	+54%	128 of 149	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	100	62.6	+60%	122 of 147	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	166	72.8	+128%	121 of 136	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.