Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ELEONORA III

IMO: 9064750
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 17,846 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.52 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC ELEONORA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,846 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

86.5 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−51%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.29

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−6%)

Average speed

8.4 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−37%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,560 t

CO₂ emitted

8,077 t

8,203 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

29,600 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,526 h

147 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 86.5 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−51%)

78.8Ranks 355 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 8.4 kn · median 13.3 (−37%)

9.1Faster than 7% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.29 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−6%)

7.22Ranks 1,033 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports57%
From the EU15%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU11%

84% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,770 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC ELEONORA III
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ELEONORA III
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ELEONORA III
Container median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.6 kn	−4%	+19%	+62%	+13%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.5 kn	+6%	−24%	+139%	−28%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−26%	−25%	−49%	−29%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+5%	+4%	+203%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.4 kn	−1%	+31%	−80%	+34%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.5 kn	−7%	−30%	−19%	+5%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−12%	−4%	+21%	−9%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	2,560	8,077	29,600	3,526	8.4	86.5	15.29	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	1,643	5,186	18,259	2,698	6.8	90.0	13.59	–
2023	not published	649	2,056	7,639	817	9.3	85.0	18.98	–
2022	not published	1,721	5,446	15,071	1,616	9.3	114.2	26.86	–
2021	not published	542	1,716	4,971	530	9.4	109.0	25.08	–
2020	not published	2,712	8,588	24,590	3,488	7.0	110.3	18.72	–
2019	not published	3,601	11,295	30,485	3,212	9.5	118.1	17.82	–
2018	not published	3,364	10,564	25,105	2,888	8.7	134.0	19.59	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	15.29	16.30	−6%	1,033 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	13.59	17.52	−22%	728 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	18.98	19.40	−2%	927 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	26.86	19.13	+40%	1,212 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	25.08	17.90	+40%	1,184 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	18.72	17.58	+6%	954 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	17.82	18.88	−6%	837 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	19.59	20.22	−3%	817 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.