Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VOLCAN DE TAUCE

IMO
9081588
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency
EIV 23.81 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.

?
?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
73.1 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.7 kg/nm (−51%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
583
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 547 (+7%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
332
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 233 (+42%)
Average speed
13.1 kn
Ro-pax median 15.7 kn (−17%)
Fuel per day at sea
23.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,016 t
CO₂ emitted
12,557 t
12,754 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
54,972 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,184 h
174 days, 48% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2024

Set against all 404 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 73.1 kg/nm · median 150.7 (−51%)
73.1Ranks 41 of 404, lowest first236.5
Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 15.7 (−17%)
11.7Faster than 21% of ro-pax ships22.4
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 582.83 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 546.68 (+7%)
58.42Ranks 210 of 404, lowest first1,957.32
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 331.57 g CO₂/t·nm · median 232.85 (+42%)
30.83Ranks 238 of 404, lowest first1,069.25
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports46%
  • From the EU28%
  • Into the EU26%
  • At berth in the EU0%

28% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,483 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • VOLCAN DE TAUCE
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • VOLCAN DE TAUCE
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • VOLCAN DE TAUCE
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • VOLCAN DE TAUCE
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2024−0.1 kn−9%−9%+19%+32%Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.3 kn−13%−11%+69%−57%Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+0.8 kn−4%+2%+0%+2,559%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.8 kn−4%−10%+78%−87%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−1.5 kn+31%+18%−77%−28%1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−0.4 kn−11%−13%+24%−93%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025part-yearNAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.10132255105.41,817.5––
2024NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.4,01612,55754,9724,18413.173.1––
2023not published3,69611,56346,2173,49413.280.0––
2022not published2,5287,93727,4132,12312.992.2––
2021not published2,6278,23927,2772,24712.196.3––
2020not published1,5344,82415,3341,18512.9100.1––
2019not published5,12516,02867,2574,67014.476.2––
2018not published4,62914,49754,3563,67914.885.2––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025part-yearNAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.–––––––Bureau VeritasB
2024NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.582.83546.68+7%210 of 404331.57232.85+42%Bureau VeritasB
2023not published442.16680.04−35%140 of 386317.15233.94+36%Bureau VeritasA+B
2022not published1,040.13626.32+66%273 of 394457.21252.90+81%Bureau VeritasA+B
2021not published39.12815.19−95%28 of 377379.10226.00+68%Bureau VeritasA+B
2020not published290.47750.91−61%116 of 387347.99217.49+60%Bureau VeritasA+B
2019not published403.60569.03−29%152 of 394403.60222.56+81%Bureau VeritasA+B
2018not published5,517.58728.92+657%347 of 361586.38184.05+219%Bureau VeritasA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.