Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MANASSA MIRA M

IMO: 9081992
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.91 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: PAKSOY-1

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Manassa 2M Shipmanagement Co

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

32.6 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

27.95

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+10%)

Average speed

9.9 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

7.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

486 t

CO₂ emitted

1,535 t

1,559 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

14,912 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,500 h

63 days, 17% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 32.6 kg/nm · median 35.3 (−8%)

17.4Ranks 1,261 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 9.3 (+6%)

7.0Faster than 63% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 27.95 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+10%)

10.14Ranks 1,580 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU49%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU7%

8% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (127 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MANASSA MIRA M
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MANASSA MIRA M
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

MANASSA MIRA M
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−22%	−26%	+9%	−3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	−2%	+17%	+75%	+5%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−10%	−20%	−30%	−15%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+15%	+14%	−46%	+30%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+12%	+8%	−27%	−13%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−4%	+6%	+229%	+15%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.9 kn	+2%	+28%	−68%	+3%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Manassa 2M Shipmanagement Co	421	1,329	13,453	1,366	9.9	31.3	–	–
2025	GARGANEY MARITIME INC	486	1,535	14,912	1,500	9.9	32.6	–	–
2024	Manassa 2M Shipmanagement Co	572	1,808	13,715	1,312	10.5	41.7	–	–
2023	not published	334	1,055	7,826	892	8.8	42.7	–	–
2022	not published	530	1,659	11,186	1,121	10.0	47.4	–	–
2021	not published	861	2,695	20,901	2,088	10.0	41.2	–	–
2020	not published	1,060	3,313	28,808	2,772	10.4	36.8	–	–
2019	not published	334	1,046	8,761	919	9.5	38.2	24.61	–
2018	not published	1,014	3,165	27,178	3,590	7.6	37.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Manassa 2M Shipmanagement Co	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2025	GARGANEY MARITIME INC	27.95	25.45	+10%	1,580 of 2,706	Verifavia	A+B
2024	Manassa 2M Shipmanagement Co	28.70	19.25	+49%	872 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	27.27	20.67	+32%	758 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	31.95	21.57	+48%	805 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	24.57	22.70	+8%	676 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	28.34	24.50	+16%	749 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	24.61	24.96	−1%	563 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	23.85	24.89	−4%	488 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.