Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MANASSA MIRA M

IMO: 9081992
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Palau
Port of registry: Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.91 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: PAKSOY-1

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Manassa 2M Shipmanagement Co

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

41.2

General cargo median 55.9 kg/nm (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

24.6

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 22.7 (+8%)

Average speed

10.0 kn

General cargo median 10.9 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

861 t

CO₂ emitted

2,695 t

Distance sailed

20,901 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,088 h

87 days, 24% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 32.6 kg/nm · median 35.2 (−7%)

17.4Ranks 1,277 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 9.3 (+6%)

6.9Faster than 63% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 28.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+10%)

10.2Ranks 1,585 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU50%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

69 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MANASSA MIRA M
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MANASSA MIRA M
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

MANASSA MIRA M
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−22%	−26%	+9%	−3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	−2%	+17%	+75%	+5%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−10%	−20%	−30%	−15%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+15%	+14%	−46%	+30%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+12%	+8%	−27%	−13%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−4%	+6%	+229%	+15%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.9 kn	+2%	+28%	−68%	+3%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Manassa 2M Shipmanagement Co	421	1,329	13,453	1,366	9.9	31.3	–	–
2025	GARGANEY MARITIME INC	486	1,535	14,912	1,500	9.9	32.6	–	–
2024	Manassa 2M Shipmanagement Co	572	1,808	13,715	1,312	10.5	41.7	–	–
2023	not published	334	1,055	7,826	892	8.8	42.7	–	–
2022	not published	530	1,659	11,186	1,121	10.0	47.4	–	–
2021	not published	861	2,695	20,901	2,088	10.0	41.2	–	–
2020	not published	1,060	3,313	28,808	2,772	10.4	36.8	–	–
2019	not published	334	1,046	8,761	919	9.5	38.2	24.6	–
2018	not published	1,014	3,165	27,178	3,590	7.6	37.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Manassa 2M Shipmanagement Co	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2025	GARGANEY MARITIME INC	28.0	25.5	+10%	1,585 of 2,723	Verifavia	A+B
2024	Manassa 2M Shipmanagement Co	28.7	19.3	+49%	872 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	27.3	20.7	+32%	758 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	32.0	21.6	+48%	805 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	24.6	22.7	+8%	676 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	28.3	24.5	+16%	749 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	24.6	25.0	−1%	563 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	23.9	24.9	−4%	488 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.