Navalyze · Container · Ship

MED CORLU

IMO: 9106479
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 9,216 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Tekirdag
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.98 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,543 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

77.5

Container median 165 kg/nm (−53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+67%)

Average speed

8.8 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−33%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,467 t

CO₂ emitted

4,638 t

Distance sailed

18,931 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,144 h

89 days, 24% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 87.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−51%)

78.8Ranks 371 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.0 kn · median 13.3 (−32%)

9.1Faster than 10% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+83%)

7.22Ranks 1,682 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU48%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

191 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MED CORLU
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED CORLU
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED CORLU
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+11%	+16%	−56%	+3%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+2%	+0%	−31%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−4.7 kn	+3%	−33%	−2%	+2%	4.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+4.3 kn	+2%	+50%	+9%	+8%	4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−7%	−12%	+8%	−3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+7%	+11%	+39%	−9%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	−4%	+3%	−6%	−49%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	512	1,609	5,849	647	9.0	87.5	29.8	–
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	1,037	3,256	13,150	1,517	8.7	78.8	28.8	–
2023	not published	1,467	4,638	18,931	2,144	8.8	77.5	32.5	–
2022	not published	1,452	4,566	19,316	1,431	13.5	75.2	32.0	–
2021	not published	1,297	4,075	17,665	1,914	9.2	73.4	29.5	–
2020	not published	1,290	4,073	16,402	1,676	9.8	78.6	30.5	–
2019	not published	862	2,688	11,761	1,249	9.4	73.3	33.4	–
2018	not published	951	2,966	12,517	1,418	8.8	76.0	65.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	29.8	16.3	+83%	1,682 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	28.8	17.5	+65%	1,429 of 1,974	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	32.5	19.4	+67%	1,394 of 1,899	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	32.0	19.1	+67%	1,336 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	29.5	17.9	+65%	1,291 of 1,781	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	30.5	17.6	+74%	1,344 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	33.4	18.9	+77%	1,321 of 1,788	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	65.7	20.2	+225%	1,608 of 1,705	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.