Navalyze · Container · Ship

MED DENIZLI

IMO: 9106493
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,459 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Tekirdag
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.98 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,408 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

78.9

Container median 172 kg/nm (−54%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

33.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+91%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−26%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,453 t

CO₂ emitted

4,589 t

Distance sailed

18,421 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,780 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 79.3 kg/nm · median 177 (−55%)

78.8Ranks 230 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 13.3 (−29%)

9.1Faster than 12% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+108%)

7.22Ranks 1,762 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU46%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

149 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MED DENIZLI
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED DENIZLI
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED DENIZLI
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+2%	−2%	−27%	+25%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	−5%	+1%	−36%	−9%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.8 kn	+2%	−21%	+26%	+14%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.4 kn	+8%	+22%	+25%	+2%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−6%	−4%	−42%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	+10%	+26%	+12%	+19%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−14%	−4%	+98%	−69%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	618	1,969	7,793	825	9.4	79.3	33.9	–
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	834	2,616	10,729	1,091	9.8	77.7	27.0	–
2023	not published	1,372	4,338	16,735	1,811	9.2	82.0	29.9	–
2022	not published	1,061	3,330	13,243	1,105	12.0	80.2	26.3	–
2021	not published	788	2,477	10,623	1,003	10.6	74.2	25.8	–
2020	not published	1,453	4,589	18,421	1,780	10.4	78.9	33.6	–
2019	not published	1,179	3,680	16,428	1,817	9.0	71.7	28.2	–
2018	not published	692	2,158	8,314	1,020	8.1	83.2	89.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	33.9	16.3	+108%	1,762 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	27.0	17.5	+54%	1,382 of 1,974	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	29.9	19.4	+54%	1,346 of 1,899	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	26.3	19.1	+37%	1,186 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	25.8	17.9	+44%	1,206 of 1,781	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	33.6	17.6	+91%	1,387 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	28.2	18.9	+49%	1,210 of 1,788	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	89.8	20.2	+344%	1,673 of 1,705	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.