Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CENK G

IMO: 9108556
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 24,875.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: EUROFERRY MALTA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Cenk Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

71.6 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

124,165

g CO₂/pax·nm

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

254

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

7.0 kn

Fuel per day at sea

12.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,647 t

CO₂ emitted

8,387 t

8,517 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

36,963 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,281 h

220 days, 60% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2023

Set against all 386 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 76.2 kg/nm · median 153.0 (−50%)

77.3Ranks 36 of 386, lowest first233.8

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 16.0 (−28%)

12.0Faster than 8% of ro-pax ships22.2

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 4,498.02 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 680.04 (+561%)

75.81Ranks 384 of 386, lowest first1,703.94

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU37%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU2%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,603 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CENK G
Ro-pax median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CENK G
Ro-pax median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

CENK G
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

CENK G
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	+3%	−18%	+186%	–	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.7 kn	−9%	−31%	−71%	–	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+13%	+8%	+0%	+42%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	−14%	−6%	+5,258%	−13%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.3 kn	+4%	−14%	−98%	+3,469%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	−25%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−16%	−22%	+17%	−4%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Cenk Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S	2,647	8,387	36,963	5,281	7.0	71.6	–	–
2024	Cenk Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S	898	2,814	12,939	1,461	8.9	69.4	–	–
2023	not published	3,404	10,639	44,693	3,855	11.6	76.2	–	–
2022	not published	3,023	9,447	44,633	3,703	12.1	67.7	–	–
2021	not published	65	204	833	75	11.1	78.4	–	–
2020	not published	4,080	12,885	53,979	4,038	13.4	75.6	–	–
2019	not published	5,414	17,091	72,302	5,429	13.3	74.9	–	–
2018	not published	5,529	17,491	61,737	4,309	14.3	89.6	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Cenk Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B
2024	Cenk Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B
2023	not published	4,498.02	680.04	+561%	384 of 386	–	–	–	ClassNK	B
2022	not published	3,166.67	626.32	+406%	383 of 394	82.11	252.90	−68%	ClassNK	B
2021	not published	3,647.17	815.19	+347%	360 of 377	129.63	226.00	−43%	ClassNK	B
2020	not published	102.19	750.91	−86%	72 of 387	102.19	217.49	−53%	RINA	A
2019	not published	100.40	569.03	−82%	73 of 394	100.40	222.56	−55%	RINA	A
2018	not published	105.01	728.92	−86%	68 of 361	67.02	184.05	−64%	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.