Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC DYMPHNA

IMO: 9110391
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 42,348 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 39,957 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

224

Container median 174 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−7%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

82.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,003 t

CO₂ emitted

53,141 t

Distance sailed

75,782 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,948 h

206 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 233 kg/nm · median 177 (+32%)

78.8Ranks 1,519 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 13.3 (+12%)

9.1Faster than 76% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+5%)

7.22Ranks 1,170 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports53%
From the EU19%
Into the EU25%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,860 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC DYMPHNA
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0260.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC DYMPHNA
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC DYMPHNA
Container median

16.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	+13%	+23%	−24%	+2%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+7%	+8%	+2%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	+7%	−8%	+198%	+12%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−26%	−24%	−52%	−19%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+15%	+16%	−17%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−5%	−6%	−39%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+2.5 kn	+8%	+29%	+81%	−16%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	9,952	31,069	42,729	2,866	14.9	233	17.2	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	11,474	35,789	55,891	4,058	13.8	205	16.9	–
2023	not published	10,519	32,803	54,745	4,018	13.6	192	18.9	–
2022	not published	3,317	10,345	18,391	1,164	15.8	180	17.0	–
2021	not published	9,424	29,721	38,509	2,521	15.3	245	21.0	–
2020	not published	9,856	31,063	46,179	3,059	15.1	213	18.2	–
2019	not published	17,003	53,141	75,782	4,948	15.3	224	17.6	–
2018	not published	8,673	27,049	41,876	3,260	12.8	207	20.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	17.2	16.3	+5%	1,170 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	16.9	17.5	−4%	948 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	18.9	19.4	−2%	923 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	17.0	19.1	−11%	816 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	21.0	17.9	+17%	1,044 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	18.2	17.6	+4%	936 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	17.6	18.9	−7%	815 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	20.8	20.2	+3%	881 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.