Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

PRINCE HADI

IMO: 9125217
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 11,350 t
Port of registry: Freetown
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.84 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bella Shipholding Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,350 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

65.6 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+86%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

17.85

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−30%)

Average speed

7.5 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

403 t

CO₂ emitted

1,276 t

1,295 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,142 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

823 h

34 days, 9% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 65.6 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+86%)

17.4Ranks 2,162 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 7.5 kn · median 9.3 (−19%)

7.0Faster than 14% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 17.85 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−30%)

10.14Ranks 630 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU9%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (703 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PRINCE HADI
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRINCE HADI
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

PRINCE HADI
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−3.7 kn	+10%	−27%	−47%	−30%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	−1%	+24%	+835%	+145%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.9 kn	+12%	−16%	−90%	−47%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−12%	−6%	+91%	+35%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.1 kn	−13%	+7%	−19%	+27%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−17%	−3%	+19%	−28%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	+23%	+0%	+276%	+4%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Bella Shipholding Ltd	403	1,276	6,142	823	7.5	65.6	18.30	–
2024	Bella Shipholding Ltd	697	2,185	11,673	1,045	11.2	59.7	27.29	–
2023	not published	76	239	1,248	141	8.9	60.5	10.79	–
2022	not published	645	2,036	11,903	1,011	11.8	54.1	20.36	–
2021	not published	385	1,217	6,228	566	11.0	61.8	15.07	–
2020	not published	544	1,723	7,690	861	8.9	70.7	11.51	–
2019	not published	556	1,740	6,487	852	7.6	85.6	16.49	–
2018	not published	120	376	1,727	186	9.3	69.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bella Shipholding Ltd	17.85	25.45	−30%	630 of 2,706	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Bella Shipholding Ltd	25.49	19.25	+32%	801 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	10.39	20.67	−50%	206 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	19.59	21.57	−9%	423 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	14.51	22.70	−36%	201 of 1,142	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	11.44	24.50	−53%	119 of 1,167	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	15.97	24.96	−36%	207 of 1,154	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	15.36	24.89	−38%	196 of 1,044	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.