Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

PRINCE HADI

IMO: 9125217
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 11,350 t
Flag (estimated): Sierra Leone
Port of registry: Freetown
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.84 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bella Shipholding Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,765 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

60.5

General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

10.4

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.7 (−50%)

Average speed

8.9 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

76 t

CO₂ emitted

239 t

Distance sailed

1,248 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

141 h

6 days, 2% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.6 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+86%)

17.4Ranks 2,178 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 7.5 kn · median 9.3 (−19%)

6.9Faster than 14% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 17.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−30%)

10.2Ranks 632 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU73%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

13 t

5.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PRINCE HADI
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRINCE HADI
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

PRINCE HADI
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.7 kn	+10%	−27%	−47%	−30%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	−1%	+24%	+835%	+145%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.9 kn	+12%	−16%	−90%	−47%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−12%	−6%	+91%	+35%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.1 kn	−13%	+7%	−19%	+27%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−17%	−3%	+19%	−28%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	+23%	+0%	+276%	+4%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bella Shipholding Ltd	403	1,276	6,142	823	7.5	65.6	18.3	–
2024	Bella Shipholding Ltd	697	2,185	11,673	1,045	11.2	59.7	27.3	–
2023	not published	76	239	1,248	141	8.9	60.5	10.8	–
2022	not published	645	2,036	11,903	1,011	11.8	54.1	20.4	–
2021	not published	385	1,217	6,228	566	11.0	61.8	15.1	–
2020	not published	544	1,723	7,690	861	8.9	70.7	11.5	–
2019	not published	556	1,740	6,487	852	7.6	85.6	16.5	–
2018	not published	120	376	1,727	186	9.3	69.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bella Shipholding Ltd	17.9	25.5	−30%	632 of 2,723	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Bella Shipholding Ltd	25.5	19.3	+32%	801 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	10.4	20.7	−50%	206 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	19.6	21.6	−9%	423 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	14.5	22.7	−36%	201 of 1,142	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	11.4	24.5	−53%	119 of 1,167	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	16.0	25.0	−36%	207 of 1,154	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	15.4	24.9	−38%	196 of 1,044	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.