Navalyze · Container · Ship

CORELLI

IMO: 9126766
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,103 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Izmir
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.95 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,080 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

60.9

Container median 178 kg/nm (−66%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−10%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−31%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,339 t

CO₂ emitted

7,312 t

Distance sailed

38,389 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,086 h

170 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 67.3 kg/nm · median 177 (−62%)

78.8Ranks 84 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 7.9 kn · median 13.3 (−41%)

9.1Faster than 5% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+28%)

7.22Ranks 1,382 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU36%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

555 t

7.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CORELLI
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CORELLI
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CORELLI
Container median

15.017.520.022.525.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+2%	+3%	+19%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−3.7 kn	+3%	−30%	−23%	−16%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.1 kn	+5%	+28%	−4%	+44%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−2%	−7%	+8%	−13%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−6%	−10%	−30%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+0%	+6%	−4%	−7%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−2%	−8%	+3%	−9%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	2,270	7,137	33,735	4,248	7.9	67.3	20.9	–
2024	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	1,870	5,888	28,377	3,628	7.8	65.9	20.8	–
2023	not published	2,348	7,353	36,670	3,199	11.5	64.0	24.8	–
2022	not published	2,339	7,312	38,389	4,086	9.4	60.9	17.2	–
2021	not published	2,213	6,912	35,483	3,602	9.9	62.4	19.7	–
2020	not published	3,392	10,598	50,882	4,981	10.2	66.7	17.6	–
2019	not published	3,533	11,032	53,040	5,491	9.7	66.6	18.9	–
2018	not published	3,497	10,917	51,331	4,988	10.3	68.1	20.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	20.9	16.3	+28%	1,382 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	20.8	17.5	+19%	1,175 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	24.8	19.4	+28%	1,177 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	17.2	19.1	−10%	825 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	19.7	17.9	+10%	974 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	17.6	17.6	−0%	899 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	18.9	18.9	+0%	899 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	20.8	20.2	+3%	888 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.