Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

EOS

IMO: 9132014
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 744 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: FINNMASTER, EUROCARGO SICILIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,135 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

110

Ro-ro median 109 kg/nm (+0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

109

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 104 (+5%)

Average speed

17.9 kn

Ro-ro median 14.8 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

47.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,930 t

CO₂ emitted

30,952 t

Distance sailed

90,587 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,055 h

211 days, 58% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 147 kg/nm · median 105 (+40%)

56.6Ranks 216 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 14.4 (−22%)

10.9Faster than 12% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 620 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+551%)

47.4Ranks 229 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU49%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

535 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EOS
Ro-ro median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EOS
Ro-ro median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EOS
Ro-ro median

0.0200400600800

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+6%	+9%	−19%	+65%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−6.5 kn	+16%	−27%	−63%	+113%	6.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+5%	+5%	−36%	+57%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+3%	+0%	+2%	+3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−1%	+2%	−27%	−2%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	−5%	−6%	+9%	+1%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	+10%	+16%	+32%	−23%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	2,561	8,051	17,453	1,564	11.2	147	620	–
2024part-year	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	1,098	3,437	8,024	593	13.5	137	221	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	2,986	9,358	21,653	1,986	10.9	138	376	–
2023	not published	7,006	21,892	59,109	3,394	17.4	119	177	–
2022	not published	10,434	32,534	92,083	5,306	17.4	113	112	–
2021	not published	9,930	30,952	90,587	5,055	17.9	110	109	–
2020	not published	13,706	42,728	123,559	7,088	17.4	111	111	–
2019	not published	13,163	41,040	112,920	6,369	17.7	117	110	–
2018	not published	9,074	28,331	85,741	5,079	16.9	106	142	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	620	95.2	+551%	229 of 235	RINA	A+B
2024part-year	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	–	–	–	–	RINA	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	376	97.5	+285%	206 of 220	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	177	109	+63%	162 of 221	RINA	A
2022	not published	112	90.6	+24%	136 of 223	RINA	A
2021	not published	109	104	+5%	122 of 219	RINA	–
2020	not published	111	103	+8%	133 of 238	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	110	90.9	+21%	161 of 271	RINA	A
2018	not published	142	91.0	+56%	190 of 260	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.