Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship
ZEKREET
- IMO
- 9132818
- Type
- LNG carrier
- Flag (estimated)
- Marshall Islands
- Port of registry
- Majuro
- Technical efficiency
- EEDI 7.85 g CO₂/t·nm
- Fuel (estimated)
- Mostly LNG
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.
2022 at a glance
From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 66,161 t of cargo on average.
Where the emissions happen, 2022
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports4%
- From the EU46%
- Into the EU48%
- At berth in the EU2%
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel kg/nm
- ZEKREET
- LNG carrier median
Average speed, kn
- ZEKREET
- LNG carrier median
Year on year
| Year | Average speed | Fuel kg/nm | Fuel per day at sea | Distance | CO₂ per transport work | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023→2024 | −0.8 kn | −6% | −12% | −12% | – | 0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change. |
| 2022→2023 | +5.7 kn | −15% | +32% | −25% | – | 5.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | Hours at seah | Average speedknots at sea | Fuel kg/nmthis ship | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024LNG | K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. | 8,129 | 23,565 | 26,462 | 1,782 | 14.9 | 307 | – | – |
| 2023LNG / alt. | not published | 9,834 | 28,585 | 29,945 | 1,907 | 15.7 | 328 | 13.1 | – |
| 2022LNG / alt. | not published | 15,572 | 45,433 | 40,088 | 3,991 | 10.0 | 388 | 17.1 | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm | LNG carrier median | vs LNG carrier | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024LNG | K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. | – | – | – | – | ClassNK | C |
| 2023LNG / alt. | not published | – | – | – | – | ClassNK | C |
| 2022LNG / alt. | not published | – | – | – | – | ClassNK | C |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.