Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CIUDAD DE SOLLER

IMO
9137997
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Spain
Port of registry
Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency
EIV 16.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA
Former names
ROSALIND FRANKLIN, FINNCLIPPER, IGOUMENITSA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
207
Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (+31%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,537
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (+111%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
1,537
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (+735%)
Average speed
20.4 kn
Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+27%)
Fuel per day at sea
101.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,639 t
CO₂ emitted
33,301 t
Distance sailed
51,448 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,525 h
105 days, 29% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 198 kg/nm · median 150 (+32%)
69.3Ranks 327 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 16.3 kn · median 15.8 (+3%)
12.0Faster than 56% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 194 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−66%)
66.8Ranks 118 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 246 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−3%)
48.6Ranks 200 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports94%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2,088 t
6.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CIUDAD DE SOLLER
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • CIUDAD DE SOLLER
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CIUDAD DE SOLLER
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • CIUDAD DE SOLLER
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.6 kn+2%−2%−15%−55%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.3 kn+12%+13%−7%−37%Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+1.0 kn−1%+5%+26%+6%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−1.4 kn−15%−22%+26%+220%1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021+0.3 kn−2%−1%−15%−60%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+2.1 kn−5%+9%−17%+155,584%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−5.8 kn+9%−22%+64%−100%5.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL14,84146,53074,9004,58316.3198––
2024part-yearGRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A5,89918,46831,6641,93816.3186––
2024TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL17,14653,65187,8355,20916.9195––
2023not published16,45851,45094,0585,66016.6175––
2022not published13,23841,43574,5624,78715.6178––
2021not published12,42938,99659,2293,49217.0210––
2020not published15,01447,06370,0054,19116.7215––
2019not published19,08259,84784,3595,78414.6226––
2018not published10,63933,30151,4482,52520.4207––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL194567−66%118 of 408246253−3%RINAA
2024part-yearGRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A–––––––RINA–
2024TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL428547−22%176 of 404198233−15%RINAA
2023not published680680+0%194 of 38692.3234−61%RINAA
2022not published643626+3%201 of 39488.0253−65%RINAA
2021not published201815−75%97 of 3772,274226+906%RINA–
2020not published498751−34%146 of 387198217−9%RINAB
2019not published0.32569−100%2 of 3940.32223−100%RINAB
2018not published1,537729+111%276 of 3611,537184+735%RINAB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.