Navalyze · Container · Ship

MED TRABZON

IMO: 9141780
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 11,426 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Tekirdag
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC GIANNINA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,102 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

88.2

Container median 165 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

30.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+56%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,395 t

CO₂ emitted

13,747 t

Distance sailed

49,828 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,903 h

163 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 89.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−50%)

78.8Ranks 386 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 13.3 (−13%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+50%)

7.22Ranks 1,539 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU40%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

511 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MED TRABZON
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED TRABZON
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED TRABZON
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−7%	−7%	+0%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	+9%	−1%	−11%	−27%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−2.0 kn	−8%	−20%	+31%	+56%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.8 kn	−6%	+27%	−23%	−27%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−6%	+1%	+24%	−4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+0%	−3%	−8%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−4%	−5%	−9%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	3,948	12,395	44,350	3,822	11.6	89.0	24.5	–
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	4,259	13,314	44,273	3,837	11.5	96.2	22.1	–
2023	not published	4,395	13,747	49,828	3,903	12.8	88.2	30.3	–
2022	not published	3,620	11,396	37,955	2,563	14.8	95.4	19.4	–
2021	not published	5,018	15,842	49,455	4,510	11.0	102	26.4	–
2020	not published	4,280	13,517	39,731	3,873	10.3	108	27.6	–
2019	not published	4,634	14,482	43,197	4,059	10.6	107	26.8	–
2018	not published	5,341	16,686	47,596	4,459	10.7	112	31.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	24.5	16.3	+50%	1,539 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	22.1	17.5	+26%	1,226 of 1,974	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	30.3	19.4	+56%	1,350 of 1,899	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	19.4	19.1	+1%	920 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	26.4	17.9	+48%	1,225 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	27.6	17.6	+57%	1,288 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	26.8	18.9	+42%	1,169 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	31.6	20.2	+56%	1,195 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.