Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

HANA H

IMO: 9143855
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 26.71 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: OUED ZIZ

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HYDAR SHIPPING

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,675 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

63.4

Container median 172 kg/nm (−63%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

54.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+211%)

Average speed

6.5 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−54%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,472 t

CO₂ emitted

4,666 t

Distance sailed

23,196 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,556 h

148 days, 41% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 16.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (−54%)

17.4Ranks 221 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 18.2 kn · median 9.3 (+96%)

6.9Faster than 100% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 11.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−57%)

10.2Ranks 310 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU40%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

1,472 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

146 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HANA H
General cargo median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HANA H
General cargo median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HANA H
General cargo median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+9.7 kn	−36%	+35%	+69%	−28%	9.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.4 kn	−60%	−43%	−6%	−67%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 60%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.0 kn	−37%	−53%	−31%	−58%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+47%	+37%	−6%	+47%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 47%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.1 kn	+8%	+43%	−8%	+38%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	+7%	+68%	+13%	+15%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−7.8 kn	−14%	−70%	−27%	−34%	7.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HYDAR SHIPPING	351	1,109	21,847	1,198	18.2	16.1	–	–
2024	HYDAR SHIPPING	327	1,032	12,933	1,515	8.5	25.3	16.6	–
2023	not published	869	2,741	13,786	2,273	6.1	63.1	47.3	–
2022	not published	2,027	6,433	20,095	2,496	8.1	101	111	63%
2021	not published	1,464	4,642	21,345	2,483	8.6	68.6	75.5	94%
2020	not published	1,472	4,666	23,196	3,556	6.5	63.4	54.7	100%
2019	not published	1,220	3,830	20,491	4,944	4.1	59.5	47.5	91%
2018	not published	1,919	5,878	27,897	2,337	11.9	68.8	72.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	HYDAR SHIPPING	11.0	25.5	−57%	310 of 2,723	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2024	HYDAR SHIPPING	15.3	19.3	−20%	416 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	46.5	20.7	+125%	972 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2022	not published	111	19.1	+481%	1,820 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	75.5	17.9	+322%	1,745 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	54.7	17.6	+211%	1,635 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	47.5	18.9	+152%	1,513 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	72.3	20.2	+258%	1,627 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.