Navalyze · Container · Ship

MED CERKEZKOY

IMO: 9147215
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 8,204 t
Port of registry: Tekirdag
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.95 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,204 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

76.3 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

29.22

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+79%)

Average speed

9.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−32%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

915 t

CO₂ emitted

2,876 t

2,921 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,996 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,324 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 76.3 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−57%)

78.8Ranks 185 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 13.3 (−32%)

9.1Faster than 10% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.22 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+79%)

7.22Ranks 1,671 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU44%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU4%

63% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,800 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MED CERKEZKOY
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED CERKEZKOY
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED CERKEZKOY
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−20%	−18%	−14%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	+29%	+54%	+8%	+6%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+2%	−14%	−14%	+31%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	+4%	−11%	+127%	−18%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−7%	+3%	−19%	−15%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+4%	−2%	+27%	−4%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.5 kn	−5%	+28%	−56%	−55%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	915	2,876	11,996	1,324	9.1	76.3	29.22	–
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	1,327	4,181	13,890	1,577	8.8	95.6	35.71	–
2023	not published	954	3,015	12,892	1,751	7.4	74.0	33.71	–
2022	not published	1,087	3,415	14,970	1,719	8.7	72.6	25.78	–
2021	not published	459	1,441	6,585	645	10.2	69.7	31.34	–
2020	not published	612	1,933	8,165	887	9.2	74.9	36.75	–
2019	not published	466	1,453	6,442	658	9.8	72.3	38.39	–
2018	not published	1,128	3,515	14,807	2,029	7.3	76.2	84.90	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	29.22	16.30	+79%	1,671 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	35.71	17.52	+104%	1,556 of 1,974	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	33.71	19.40	+74%	1,430 of 1,899	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	25.78	19.13	+35%	1,170 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	31.34	17.90	+75%	1,336 of 1,781	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	36.75	17.58	+109%	1,432 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	38.39	18.88	+103%	1,393 of 1,788	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	84.90	20.22	+320%	1,661 of 1,705	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.