Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

PRINCESS LAYLA

IMO: 9149677
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 7,387 t
Flag (estimated): Sierra Leone
Port of registry: Freetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.72 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Layla Shipholding Co

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

60.4

General cargo median 58.4 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

11.4

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.9 (−54%)

Average speed

8.2 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

246 t

CO₂ emitted

770 t

Distance sailed

4,080 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

500 h

21 days, 6% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 66.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+88%)

17.4Ranks 2,189 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 9.3 (+13%)

6.9Faster than 73% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 27.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+7%)

10.2Ranks 1,514 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU6%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

72 t

9.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PRINCESS LAYLA
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRINCESS LAYLA
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

PRINCESS LAYLA
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.2 kn	−1%	+25%	+92%	+164%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+4%	−4%	+24%	−37%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−23%	−18%	−31%	−17%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.6 kn	+30%	−1%	−55%	+92%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.8 kn	−13%	+33%	−1%	−36%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.2 kn	+8%	−25%	−56%	+15%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.2 kn	+15%	+46%	+368%	+21%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Layla Shipholding Co	410	1,301	6,204	588	10.5	66.1	28.4	–
2024	Layla Shipholding Co	216	678	3,232	387	8.3	66.9	10.7	–
2023	not published	168	531	2,599	287	9.1	64.5	16.9	–
2022	not published	316	999	3,749	447	8.4	84.3	20.1	–
2021	not published	541	1,709	8,329	756	11.0	65.0	10.4	–
2020	not published	624	1,972	8,380	1,156	7.2	74.4	17.0	–
2019	not published	1,320	4,131	19,085	1,843	10.4	69.2	15.0	–
2018	not published	246	770	4,080	500	8.2	60.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Layla Shipholding Co	27.2	25.5	+7%	1,514 of 2,723	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Layla Shipholding Co	10.3	19.3	−47%	263 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	16.2	20.7	−22%	358 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	19.5	21.6	−10%	419 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	10.2	22.7	−55%	98 of 1,142	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	15.9	24.5	−35%	209 of 1,167	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	13.9	25.0	−44%	160 of 1,154	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	11.4	24.9	−54%	126 of 1,044	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.