Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC GIOVANNA VII

IMO: 9153850
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 69,442 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.29 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MAERSK KIEL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 66,461 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

201

Container median 178 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.44

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−51%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

62.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,400 t

CO₂ emitted

38,636 t

Distance sailed

61,582 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,757 h

198 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 208 kg/nm · median 177 (+17%)

78.8Ranks 1,329 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 88% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−43%)

7.22Ranks 499 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU42%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

12,127 t

98% of all fuel; 2% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

858 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC GIOVANNA VII
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC GIOVANNA VII
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC GIOVANNA VII
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	−5%	+4%	−40%	−2%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+4.4 kn	+11%	+60%	+75%	−24%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.8 kn	−2%	−24%	−81%	+33%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	−12%	−25%	+271%	−16%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+6.4 kn	+3%	+78%	+1,695%	−32%	6.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.6 kn	−5%	−27%	−50%	−6%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.4 kn	+31%	+67%	−7%	−5%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	2,477	7,727	11,914	751	15.9	208	9.34	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	4,360	13,618	19,960	1,378	14.5	218	9.54	–
2023	not published	2,245	7,074	11,436	1,134	10.1	196	12.6	–
2022	not published	12,400	38,636	61,582	4,757	12.9	201	9.44	98%
2021	not published	3,779	11,846	16,602	1,093	15.2	228	11.2	–
2020	not published	204	639	925	106	8.8	221	16.5	100%
2019	not published	425	1,329	1,834	160	11.4	232	17.5	100%
2018	not published	348	1,088	1,971	219	9.0	177	18.4	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	9.34	16.3	−43%	499 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	9.54	17.5	−46%	417 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	12.6	19.4	−35%	573 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	9.44	19.1	−51%	281 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	11.2	17.9	−37%	417 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	16.5	17.6	−6%	818 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	17.5	18.9	−7%	808 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	18.4	20.2	−9%	748 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.