Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LARISSA 1

IMO: 9154268
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 6,256 t
Port of registry: Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: KAN 2

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: PARADIS GEMI ISLETME KIRALAMA ACENTELIK HIZMETLERI TIC.LTD.STI.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,256 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

59.0 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

–

g CO₂/dwt·nm

Average speed

9.0 kn

Fuel per day at sea

12.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

228 t

CO₂ emitted

713 t

724 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

3,857 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

428 h

18 days, 5% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 63.3 kg/nm · median 58.7 (+8%)

34.9Ranks 624 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 8.2 kn · median 10.5 (−22%)

7.8Faster than 12% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 22.77 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.25 (+18%)

7.51Ranks 703 of 1,111, lowest first39.26

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU40%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU4%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (392 t).

Fuel burned laden

57%

43% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LARISSA 1
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LARISSA 1
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

LARISSA 1
General cargo median

15.017.520.022.525.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−7%	+2%	−60%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+12%	+29%	−39%	+3%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.5 kn	−8%	−31%	+14%	+12%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	+0%	−13%	−63%	+19%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+7%	+6%	+28%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−12%	−6%	+7%	−7%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−15%	−18%	+71%	+2%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	PARADIS GEMI ISLETME KIRALAMA ACENTELIK HIZMETLERI TIC.LTD.STI.	228	713	3,857	428	9.0	59.0	29.53	57%
2024	PARADIS GEMI ISLETME KIRALAMA ACENTELIK HIZMETLERI TIC.LTD.STI.	611	1,931	9,653	1,176	8.2	63.3	22.77	–
2023	not published	895	2,832	15,871	2,222	7.1	56.4	24.05	–
2022	not published	851	2,695	13,946	1,450	9.6	61.0	20.48	–
2021	not published	2,303	7,296	37,817	3,413	11.1	60.9	17.80	–
2020	not published	1,678	5,310	29,565	2,632	11.2	56.8	20.67	–
2019	not published	1,781	5,606	27,603	2,635	10.5	64.5	22.03	–
2018	not published	1,220	3,822	16,156	1,481	10.9	75.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	PARADIS GEMI ISLETME KIRALAMA ACENTELIK HIZMETLERI TIC.LTD.STI.	–	–	–	–	Phoenix Register of Shipping	A
2024	PARADIS GEMI ISLETME KIRALAMA ACENTELIK HIZMETLERI TIC.LTD.STI.	22.77	19.25	+18%	703 of 1,111	Phoenix Register of Shipping	A
2023	not published	22.02	20.67	+7%	589 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2022	not published	19.67	21.57	−9%	426 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	16.52	22.70	−27%	274 of 1,142	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	20.40	24.50	−17%	385 of 1,167	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	21.84	24.96	−13%	426 of 1,154	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	21.40	24.89	−14%	389 of 1,044	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.