Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LARISSA 1

IMO: 9154268
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 6,256 t
Flag (estimated): Palau
Port of registry: Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: KAN 2

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: PARADIS GEMI ISLETME KIRALAMA ACENTELIK HIZMETLERI TIC.LTD.STI.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

75.5

General cargo median 58.4 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

21.4

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.9 (−14%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,220 t

CO₂ emitted

3,822 t

Distance sailed

16,156 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,481 h

62 days, 17% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 63.3 kg/nm · median 58.7 (+8%)

34.9Ranks 624 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 8.2 kn · median 10.5 (−22%)

7.8Faster than 12% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 22.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.3 (+18%)

7.51Ranks 703 of 1,111, lowest first39.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports24%
From the EU24%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

163 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LARISSA 1
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LARISSA 1
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

LARISSA 1
General cargo median

15.017.520.022.525.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−7%	+2%	−60%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+12%	+29%	−39%	+3%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.5 kn	−8%	−31%	+14%	+12%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	+0%	−13%	−63%	+19%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+7%	+6%	+28%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−12%	−6%	+7%	−7%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−15%	−18%	+71%	+2%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	PARADIS GEMI ISLETME KIRALAMA ACENTELIK HIZMETLERI TIC.LTD.STI.	228	713	3,857	428	9.0	59.0	29.5	57%
2024	PARADIS GEMI ISLETME KIRALAMA ACENTELIK HIZMETLERI TIC.LTD.STI.	611	1,931	9,653	1,176	8.2	63.3	22.8	–
2023	not published	895	2,832	15,871	2,222	7.1	56.4	24.1	–
2022	not published	851	2,695	13,946	1,450	9.6	61.0	20.5	–
2021	not published	2,303	7,296	37,817	3,413	11.1	60.9	17.8	–
2020	not published	1,678	5,310	29,565	2,632	11.2	56.8	20.7	–
2019	not published	1,781	5,606	27,603	2,635	10.5	64.5	22.0	–
2018	not published	1,220	3,822	16,156	1,481	10.9	75.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	PARADIS GEMI ISLETME KIRALAMA ACENTELIK HIZMETLERI TIC.LTD.STI.	–	–	–	–	Phoenix Register of Shipping	A
2024	PARADIS GEMI ISLETME KIRALAMA ACENTELIK HIZMETLERI TIC.LTD.STI.	22.8	19.3	+18%	703 of 1,111	Phoenix Register of Shipping	A
2023	not published	22.0	20.7	+7%	589 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2022	not published	19.7	21.6	−9%	426 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	16.5	22.7	−27%	274 of 1,142	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	20.4	24.5	−17%	385 of 1,167	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	21.8	25.0	−13%	426 of 1,154	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	21.4	24.9	−14%	389 of 1,044	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.