Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ABANA

IMO: 9158070
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.79 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NETBURG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: KAMER MARINE ULUSLARARASI NAKLIYAT A.S.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,268 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

44.0

Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (−52%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (+162%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,386 t

CO₂ emitted

4,438 t

Distance sailed

31,495 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,907 h

121 days, 33% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 39.8 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+13%)

17.4Ranks 1,549 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 9.3 (+6%)

6.9Faster than 62% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 22.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−10%)

10.2Ranks 1,084 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU10%
Into the EU64%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

50 t

1.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ABANA
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ABANA
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ABANA
General cargo median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.0 kn	−2%	−18%	−5%	–	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	+3%	−6%	+9%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.0 kn	−20%	−5%	−13%	–	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	+12%	+14%	+15%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−12%	−16%	+237%	−40%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+4.7 kn	+4%	+74%	+10%	+24%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	KAMER MARINE ULUSLARARASI NAKLIYAT A.S.	1,307	4,191	32,881	3,315	9.9	39.8	–	1%
2024	KAMER MARINE ULUSLARARASI NAKLIYAT A.S.	1,404	4,501	34,666	2,910	11.9	40.5	–	–
2023	not published	1,251	4,012	31,710	2,442	13.0	39.5	17.1	–
2022	not published	1,789	5,736	36,317	3,300	11.0	49.3	24.6	–
2021	not published	1,386	4,438	31,495	2,907	10.8	44.0	22.5	–
2020	not published	466	1,458	9,350	821	11.4	49.9	–	–
2019	not published	406	1,271	8,474	1,258	6.7	48.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	KAMER MARINE ULUSLARARASI NAKLIYAT A.S.	22.9	25.5	−10%	1,084 of 2,723	Verifavia	B
2024	KAMER MARINE ULUSLARARASI NAKLIYAT A.S.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+C
2022	not published	24.6	8.71	+182%	3,825 of 3,968	ClassNK	A+C
2021	not published	22.5	8.57	+162%	3,348 of 3,466	ClassNK	A+C
2020	not published	37.4	24.5	+52%	943 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	30.2	25.0	+21%	748 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.