Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SAVA

IMO: 9158082
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EIV 15.78 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: KAMER MARINE ULUSLARARASI NAKLIYAT A.S.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,467 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

47.1

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (−45%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (+182%)

Average speed

9.3 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,549 t

CO₂ emitted

4,966 t

Distance sailed

32,873 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,518 h

147 days, 40% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 35.3 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+0%)

17.4Ranks 1,367 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 9.3 (+5%)

6.9Faster than 60% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 19.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−22%)

10.2Ranks 809 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU34%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

104 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SAVA
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAVA
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SAVA
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−4%	−10%	−25%	–	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	−22%	−13%	−6%	–	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−0%	+3%	+35%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+2%	+1%	−19%	+18%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+11%	+9%	−8%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	+4%	+15%	−1%	–	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−2%	+11%	+10%	−4%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	KAMER MARINE ULUSLARARASI NAKLIYAT A.S.	824	2,641	23,367	2,385	9.8	35.3	–	–
2024	KAMER MARINE ULUSLARARASI NAKLIYAT A.S.	1,145	3,670	30,998	2,973	10.4	36.9	–	–
2023	not published	1,549	4,966	32,873	3,518	9.3	47.1	23.4	–
2022	not published	1,153	3,697	24,418	2,683	9.1	47.2	27.2	–
2021	not published	1,394	4,468	30,119	3,278	9.2	46.3	22.9	–
2020	not published	1,365	4,377	32,648	3,477	9.4	41.8	22.1	–
2019	not published	1,319	4,130	32,889	3,877	8.5	40.1	–	3%
2018	not published	1,222	3,821	29,914	3,953	7.6	40.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	KAMER MARINE ULUSLARARASI NAKLIYAT A.S.	19.8	25.5	−22%	809 of 2,723	Verifavia	A+B
2024	KAMER MARINE ULUSLARARASI NAKLIYAT A.S.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	23.4	8.27	+182%	3,374 of 3,548	ClassNK	A+C
2022	not published	27.2	8.71	+212%	3,861 of 3,968	ClassNK	A+C
2021	not published	22.9	8.57	+168%	3,355 of 3,466	ClassNK	A+C
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	20.8	25.0	−17%	387 of 1,154	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	21.7	24.9	−13%	405 of 1,044	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.