Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

BALTIC LORD

IMO: 9160724
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,892 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EIV 25.61 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: OWH Shipmanagement GmbH

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,475 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

89.3

Reefer median 86.2 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

62.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 72.8 (−14%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Reefer median 15.3 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,602 t

CO₂ emitted

5,010 t

Distance sailed

17,930 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,133 h

47 days, 13% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 94.1 kg/nm · median 82.9 (+14%)

55.8Ranks 83 of 109, lowest first118

Average speedThis ship 16.4 kn · median 14.6 (+12%)

8.2Faster than 84% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 49.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.8 (−12%)

36.7Ranks 38 of 109, lowest first140

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU51%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

234 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BALTIC LORD
Reefer median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BALTIC LORD
Reefer median

14.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BALTIC LORD
Reefer median

30.040.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−9%	−7%	+379%	+36%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+22%	+19%	−76%	−24%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−13%	−10%	−31%	−29%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	+5%	+15%	+14%	+21%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+6%	+0%	+114%	−9%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	OWH Shipmanagement GmbH	1,693	5,289	17,998	1,097	16.4	94.1	49.9	–
2024	OWH Shipmanagement GmbH	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023	not published	3,300	10,335	34,670	2,019	17.2	95.2	49.7	–
2022	not published	758	2,391	7,244	433	16.7	105	36.6	–
2021	not published	2,596	8,135	30,195	1,763	17.1	86.0	48.4	–
2020	not published	4,358	13,706	43,829	2,672	16.4	99.4	68.2	–
2019	not published	3,655	11,429	38,442	2,578	14.9	95.1	56.5	–
2018	not published	1,602	5,010	17,930	1,133	15.8	89.3	62.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	OWH Shipmanagement GmbH	49.9	56.8	−12%	38 of 109	Verifavia	A+B+C
2024	OWH Shipmanagement GmbH	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B+C
2023	not published	49.7	55.6	−11%	52 of 135	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	36.6	55.3	−34%	18 of 143	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	48.4	55.0	−12%	55 of 158	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	68.2	59.1	+15%	93 of 149	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	56.5	62.6	−10%	60 of 147	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	62.4	72.8	−14%	48 of 136	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.