Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MISSISSAUGA EXPRESS

IMO
9165358
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
22,117 t
Flag (estimated)
Bermuda
Port of registry
Hamilton
Technical efficiency
EIV 17.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,319 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
154
Container median 182 kg/nm (−15%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
21.6
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+7%)
Average speed
12.8 kn
Container median 13.8 kn (−7%)
Fuel per day at sea
47.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
7,208 t
CO₂ emitted
22,631 t
Distance sailed
46,879 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,664 h
153 days, 42% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 146 kg/nm · median 178 (−18%)
77.9Ranks 754 of 1,825, lowest first314
Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.6 (−9%)
10.1Faster than 33% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.1 (+8%)
7.44Ranks 975 of 1,825, lowest first52.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports26%
  • From the EU49%
  • Into the EU20%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
5,730 t
80% of all fuel; 20% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1,281 t
5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MISSISSAUGA EXPRESS
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MISSISSAUGA EXPRESS
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MISSISSAUGA EXPRESS
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2022−1.8 kn−9%−21%−36%−9%1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.4 kn−1%−4%−9%−7%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020+0.8 kn−2%+4%+40%+0%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+1.0 kn+8%+16%+17%+13%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published6,53320,50444,6783,59412.414620.895%
2021not published11,25835,46870,0264,91814.216122.993%
2020not published12,45439,25476,7935,25114.616224.5100%
2019not published9,12928,67655,0223,99813.816624.4100%
2018not published7,20822,63146,8793,66412.815421.680%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published20.819.1+8%975 of 1,825ABSC
2021not published22.917.9+28%1,111 of 1,781ABSC
2020not published24.517.6+39%1,206 of 1,797ABSC
2019not published24.418.9+29%1,103 of 1,788ABSC
2018not published21.620.2+7%926 of 1,705ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.