Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

EKMEN ROYAL

IMO: 9165865
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Liberia (from the 2024 report)
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MANISA HAMUTO, HAMUTO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: EKMEN DENIZCILIK VE TICARET LTD. STI.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

50.5

General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

28.4

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (+14%)

Average speed

7.4 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (−24%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,729 t

CO₂ emitted

5,425 t

Distance sailed

34,219 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,645 h

194 days, 53% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 41.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+17%)

17.4Ranks 1,612 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 7.2 kn · median 9.3 (−23%)

6.9Faster than 12% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 24.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−5%)

10.2Ranks 1,206 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports38%
From the EU25%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

525 t

9.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EKMEN ROYAL
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EKMEN ROYAL
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

EKMEN ROYAL
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.8 kn	+30%	−14%	−53%	+29%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	−27%	−19%	+114%	−8%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−15%	−14%	+68%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	−0.3 kn	−5%	−8%	−40%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.7 kn	+6%	+46%	−60%	+8%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.1 kn	+19%	−17%	+816%	−5%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	EKMEN DENIZCILIK VE TICARET LTD. STI.	565	1,796	13,746	1,923	7.2	41.1	–	–
2024	EKMEN DENIZCILIK VE TICARET LTD. STI.	935	2,935	29,497	2,690	11.0	31.7	–	83%
2023	not published	596	1,882	13,769	1,385	9.9	43.3	–	77%
2022	not published	420	1,325	8,206	840	9.8	51.2	–	82%
2020	not published	729	2,317	13,570	1,349	10.1	53.7	49.6	–
2019	not published	1,729	5,425	34,219	4,645	7.4	50.5	–	–
2018	not published	158	494	3,735	355	10.5	42.3	–	47%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	EKMEN DENIZCILIK VE TICARET LTD. STI.	24.1	25.5	−5%	1,206 of 2,723	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	EKMEN DENIZCILIK VE TICARET LTD. STI.	18.8	19.3	−2%	539 of 1,111	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	20.5	20.7	−1%	513 of 1,045	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2022	not published	24.2	21.6	+12%	610 of 1,034	RINA	A
2020	not published	30.6	24.5	+25%	825 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	28.4	25.0	+14%	700 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	29.9	24.9	+20%	671 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.