Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

MELUSINE

IMO: 9166637
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 3,154 t
Flag (estimated): Belgium
Port of registry: Antwerpen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.34 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CLDN FERRIES NV · part of CLdN

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,728 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

95.4

Ro-ro median 109 kg/nm (−13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

110

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 103 (+7%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,182 t

CO₂ emitted

19,511 t

Distance sailed

64,781 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,629 h

193 days, 53% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 88.6 kg/nm · median 105 (−15%)

56.6Ranks 61 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 14.4 (−3%)

10.9Faster than 42% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 89.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−6%)

47.4Ranks 109 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports92%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,557 t

8.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MELUSINE
Ro-ro median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MELUSINE
Ro-ro median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MELUSINE
Ro-ro median

0.0100200300400

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+2%	+5%	−4%	−8%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+3.2 kn	+6%	+38%	+29%	−68%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.7 kn	−7%	−26%	−13%	+38%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	−2%	−13%	−31%	+96%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−6%	−2%	+55%	+1%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	+2%	−3%	−16%	+34%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	−3%	−9%	−18%	+2%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CLDN FERRIES NV	6,592	21,036	74,402	5,359	13.9	88.6	89.7	–
2024	CLDN FERRIES NV	6,752	21,445	77,851	5,769	13.5	86.7	97.8	–
2023	not published	4,946	15,560	60,488	5,856	10.3	81.8	301	–
2022	not published	6,094	19,066	69,251	5,319	13.0	88.0	218	–
2021	not published	8,974	28,276	100,322	6,831	14.7	89.5	111	–
2020	not published	6,182	19,511	64,781	4,629	14.0	95.4	110	–
2019	not published	7,250	22,844	77,511	5,252	14.8	93.5	82.5	–
2018	not published	9,120	28,739	94,883	6,035	15.7	96.1	80.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CLDN FERRIES NV	89.7	95.2	−6%	109 of 235	DNV	A+C
2024	CLDN FERRIES NV	97.8	97.5	+0%	111 of 220	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	301	109	+177%	193 of 221	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	218	90.6	+141%	191 of 223	DNV	C
2021	not published	111	104	+7%	124 of 219	DNV	C
2020	not published	110	103	+7%	131 of 238	DNV	C
2019	not published	82.5	90.9	−9%	113 of 271	DNV	C
2018	not published	80.6	91.0	−12%	97 of 260	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.