Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK PENANG

IMO
9168192
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
23,264 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EIV 23.15 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,283 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
125
Container median 174 kg/nm (−28%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
38.0
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+101%)
Average speed
14.5 kn
Container median 13.7 kn (+6%)
Fuel per day at sea
43.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
11,505 t
CO₂ emitted
35,849 t
Distance sailed
91,792 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
6,332 h
264 days, 72% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 138 kg/nm · median 178 (−22%)
77.9Ranks 706 of 1,825, lowest first314
Average speedThis ship 16.7 kn · median 13.6 (+23%)
10.1Faster than 94% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.1 (−3%)
7.44Ranks 883 of 1,825, lowest first52.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports6%
  • From the EU52%
  • Into the EU41%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
11,505 t
100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
538 t
1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MAERSK PENANG
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MAERSK PENANG
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MAERSK PENANG
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2022−0.8 kn+3%−1%−31%+2%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−2.3 kn−8%−19%+323%−18%2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+5.3 kn+16%+59%−78%−41%5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.8 kn−2%−8%+18%+125%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published8,03125,17258,1113,48716.713818.6–
2021not published11,23035,27284,0784,81717.513418.3–
2020not published2,9039,11919,8991,00719.814622.3–
2019not published11,50535,84991,7926,33214.512538.0100%
2018not published10,00031,30177,8195,07415.312916.9100%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published18.619.1−3%883 of 1,825Bureau VeritasA
2021not published18.317.9+2%907 of 1,781Bureau VeritasA
2020not published22.317.6+27%1,111 of 1,797Bureau VeritasA
2019not published38.018.9+101%1,387 of 1,788ABSC
2018not published16.920.2−16%670 of 1,705ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.