Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

HAMBURG.HS

IMO
9168403
Type
General cargo ship
Flag (estimated)
Palau
Port of registry
Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency
EEXI 15.01 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hamburg Shipping Co Ltd

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
33.2
General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (−45%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
25.8
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.7 (+25%)
Average speed
9.3 kn
General cargo median 10.5 kn (−11%)
Fuel per day at sea
7.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
112 t
CO₂ emitted
356 t
Distance sailed
3,387 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
362 h
15 days, 4% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 39.4 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+12%)
17.4Ranks 1,536 of 2,723, lowest first78.8
Average speedThis ship 6.2 kn · median 9.3 (−33%)
6.9Faster than 6% of general cargo ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 21.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−16%)
10.2Ranks 950 of 2,723, lowest first52.7
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU39%
  • Into the EU51%
  • At berth in the EU10%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
36 t
10.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • HAMBURG.HS
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • HAMBURG.HS
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • HAMBURG.HS
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−3.9 kn−1%−39%−15%−19%3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.8 kn+20%+31%+43%+2%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023–––––

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Hamburg Shipping Co Ltd1635174,1436676.239.4––
2024Hamburg Shipping Co Ltd1936094,84847810.139.7––
2023not published1123563,3873629.333.2––
2022not published00–0––––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025Hamburg Shipping Co Ltd21.425.5−16%950 of 2,723VerifaviaA
2024Hamburg Shipping Co Ltd26.419.3+37%822 of 1,111VerifaviaA
2023not published25.820.7+25%722 of 1,045VerifaviaA
2022not published––––EMICERTA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.