Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ADRIANA II

IMO: 9169055
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 13,381 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.41 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC ADRIANA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,381 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

127.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

29.80

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+83%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,815 t

CO₂ emitted

21,375 t

21,710 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

53,606 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,267 h

219 days, 60% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 127.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−28%)

78.8Ranks 757 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 13.3 (−23%)

9.1Faster than 16% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.80 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+83%)

7.22Ranks 1,678 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports50%
From the EU20%
Into the EU25%
At berth in the EU5%

78% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (16,590 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC ADRIANA II
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ADRIANA II
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ADRIANA II
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	+12%	+1%	−18%	−8%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	−4%	+10%	+50%	−3%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−16%	−24%	+10%	−20%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−7%	−3%	+27%	+40%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.1 kn	+15%	−3%	−51%	−32%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+1%	+6%	+22%	−0%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.8 kn	−6%	+11%	+121%	−4%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	6,815	21,375	53,606	5,267	10.2	127.1	29.80	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	7,457	23,284	65,668	5,801	11.3	113.5	32.31	–
2023	not published	5,149	16,248	43,710	4,397	9.9	117.8	33.22	–
2022	not published	5,616	17,718	39,869	3,626	11.0	140.8	41.61	–
2021	not published	4,793	15,115	31,494	2,986	10.5	152.2	29.67	–
2020	not published	8,549	26,955	64,750	5,149	12.6	132.0	43.59	–
2019	not published	6,938	21,634	52,987	4,418	12.0	130.9	43.70	–
2018	not published	3,334	10,399	24,009	2,352	10.2	138.9	45.51	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	29.80	16.30	+83%	1,678 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	32.31	17.52	+84%	1,498 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	33.22	19.40	+71%	1,415 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	41.61	19.13	+118%	1,502 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	29.67	17.90	+66%	1,295 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	43.59	17.58	+148%	1,524 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	43.70	18.88	+131%	1,477 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	45.51	20.22	+125%	1,419 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.