Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC MIA SUMMER II

IMO: 9169067
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 12,380 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.29 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC MIA SUMMER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,380 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

129.3 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.89

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+102%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,222 t

CO₂ emitted

22,740 t

23,095 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

55,850 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,474 h

228 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 129.3 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−27%)

78.8Ranks 775 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 13.3 (−23%)

9.1Faster than 16% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 32.89 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+102%)

7.22Ranks 1,740 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports60%
From the EU7%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU6%

83% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (18,902 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC MIA SUMMER II
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC MIA SUMMER II
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC MIA SUMMER II
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−4%	−15%	+10%	−6%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+1%	−1%	−11%	−32%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	+3%	+12%	+6%	+30%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−0%	−1%	+77%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+12%	+16%	+45%	−24%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.3 kn	−12%	−21%	−42%	+6%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.2 kn	−15%	+18%	+71%	−17%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	7,222	22,740	55,850	5,474	10.2	129.3	32.89	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	6,855	21,483	50,716	4,430	11.4	135.2	35.06	–
2023	not published	7,634	24,081	57,155	4,918	11.6	133.6	51.89	–
2022	not published	6,967	21,986	53,699	5,019	10.7	129.8	39.89	–
2021	not published	3,958	12,483	30,362	2,839	10.7	130.4	33.26	–
2020	not published	2,449	7,723	20,959	2,026	10.3	116.8	43.51	–
2019	not published	4,763	14,847	36,070	3,105	11.6	132.1	40.88	–
2018	not published	3,268	10,196	21,099	2,519	8.4	154.9	49.13	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	32.89	16.30	+102%	1,740 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	35.06	17.52	+100%	1,548 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	51.89	19.40	+167%	1,711 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	39.89	19.13	+109%	1,486 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	33.26	17.90	+86%	1,370 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	43.51	17.58	+147%	1,520 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	40.88	18.88	+117%	1,434 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	49.13	20.22	+143%	1,470 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.