Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ANNICK

IMO: 9169122
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 19,500 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.72 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,942 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

179

Container median 178 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

21.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+13%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

60.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,640 t

CO₂ emitted

42,677 t

Distance sailed

76,305 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,441 h

227 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 181 kg/nm · median 177 (+2%)

78.8Ranks 1,135 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+78%)

7.22Ranks 1,665 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU45%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,075 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ANNICK
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ANNICK
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ANNICK
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+11%	+5%	−74%	+39%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+28%	+20%	−2%	−33%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−29%	−34%	−12%	+44%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	−4%	−8%	−11%	+4%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+11%	+13%	+75%	+18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	−11%	−15%	−36%	−17%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.2 kn	+10%	+19%	+118%	+2%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	3,058	9,577	16,930	1,466	11.5	181	29.0	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	10,716	33,621	66,008	5,406	12.2	162	20.8	–
2023	not published	8,507	26,782	67,265	5,146	13.1	127	31.0	–
2022	not published	13,640	42,677	76,305	5,441	14.0	179	21.6	–
2021	not published	15,910	49,585	85,431	5,813	14.7	186	20.7	–
2020	not published	8,204	25,567	48,929	3,399	14.4	168	17.5	–
2019	not published	14,457	45,168	76,775	5,092	15.1	188	21.0	–
2018	not published	6,022	18,846	35,142	2,535	13.9	171	20.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	29.0	16.3	+78%	1,665 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	20.8	17.5	+19%	1,175 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	31.0	19.4	+60%	1,367 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	21.6	19.1	+13%	1,015 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	20.7	17.9	+16%	1,031 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	17.5	17.6	−0%	893 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	21.0	18.9	+11%	1,001 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	20.5	20.2	+1%	863 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.