Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

AVEMAR DOS

IMO: 9170183
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EEXI 32.45 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

145

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

4,807

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (+559%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

4,807

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (+2,512%)

Average speed

28.4 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+76%)

Fuel per day at sea

99.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,374 t

CO₂ emitted

33,260 t

Distance sailed

71,414 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,513 h

105 days, 29% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 157 kg/nm · median 150 (+4%)

69.3Ranks 227 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.8 kn · median 15.8 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 61% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 5,747 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+914%)

66.8Ranks 403 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 5,664 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+2,137%)

48.6Ranks 404 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports97%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

891 t

2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AVEMAR DOS
Ro-pax median

120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AVEMAR DOS
Ro-pax median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

AVEMAR DOS
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

AVEMAR DOS
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	+17%	+12%	−32%	+65%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	+1%	+8%	−18%	−6%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−1%	−2%	+14%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−5.4 kn	−14%	−35%	+61%	−26%	5.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+6.1 kn	+21%	+66%	+20%	+11%	6.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.9 kn	−17%	−5%	−58%	+510,860%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−14.2 kn	+6%	−47%	+3%	−100%	14.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	5,948	19,071	37,959	2,259	16.8	157	–	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	7,476	23,968	55,944	3,174	17.6	134	–	–
2023	not published	8,981	28,794	67,950	4,105	16.6	132	–	–
2022	not published	7,921	25,395	59,417	3,547	16.8	133	–	–
2021	not published	5,721	18,341	36,848	1,657	22.2	155	–	–
2020	not published	3,965	12,711	30,798	1,909	16.1	129	–	–
2019	not published	11,361	36,425	73,494	5,181	14.2	155	–	–
2018	not published	10,374	33,260	71,414	2,513	28.4	145	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	5,747	567	+914%	403 of 408	5,664	253	+2,137%	RINA	A+B
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	3,476	547	+536%	377 of 404	2,532	233	+988%	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	3,706	680	+445%	380 of 386	2,757	234	+1,078%	RINA	–
2022	not published	3,702	626	+491%	387 of 394	3,010	253	+1,090%	RINA	B
2021	not published	5,025	815	+516%	371 of 377	2,231	226	+887%	RINA	B
2020	not published	4,548	751	+506%	373 of 387	3,067	217	+1,310%	RINA	B
2019	not published	0.89	569	−100%	8 of 394	0.89	223	−100%	RINA	B
2018	not published	4,807	729	+559%	344 of 361	4,807	184	+2,512%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.