Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

TRANS IBERIA

IMO: 9170597
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 9,098 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.92 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stodig Ship Management AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,098 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

81.0 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.97

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+86%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,316 t

CO₂ emitted

10,421 t

10,584 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

40,952 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,981 h

124 days, 34% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 81.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+2%)

52.8Ranks 768 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 11.1 (+23%)

8.8Faster than 100% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 27.97 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+86%)

7.93Ranks 1,143 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU53%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU4%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,271 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TRANS IBERIA
Chemical tanker median

75.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TRANS IBERIA
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TRANS IBERIA
Chemical tanker median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−7%	−3%	−9%	−5%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+10%	+6%	+242%	+29%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	+1%	+7%	−57%	−24%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−7%	−10%	−8%	−13%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	−3%	−11%	−14%	+40%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.4 kn	+4%	+50%	−31%	−29%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	+11%	−5%	+33%	−71%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Stodig Ship Management AS	3,316	10,421	40,952	2,981	13.7	81.0	27.97	–
2024	Stodig Ship Management AS	3,897	12,294	44,777	3,419	13.1	87.0	29.32	–
2023	not published	1,038	3,269	13,082	963	13.6	79.3	22.72	–
2022	not published	2,399	7,521	30,451	2,392	12.7	78.8	30.04	–
2021	not published	2,808	8,818	33,113	2,528	13.1	84.8	34.63	–
2020	not published	3,386	10,600	38,664	2,720	14.2	87.6	24.81	–
2019	not published	4,720	14,804	55,942	5,683	9.8	84.4	34.72	–
2018	not published	3,200	10,027	42,174	3,664	11.5	75.9	119.96	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stodig Ship Management AS	27.97	15.04	+86%	1,143 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	Stodig Ship Management AS	29.32	16.73	+75%	976 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	22.72	16.23	+40%	872 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	30.04	16.06	+87%	1,131 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	34.63	16.69	+107%	1,132 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	24.81	16.16	+54%	974 of 1,312	DNV	B
2019	not published	34.72	17.32	+100%	1,110 of 1,321	DNV	B
2018	not published	119.96	17.14	+600%	1,281 of 1,294	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.