Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Stodig Ship Management ASyour view

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

	Stodig Ship Management AS
Ships	11
CO₂ emitted	97 kt
Fuel per mile	58 kg/nm
Average speed	11.7 kn
CO₂ at berth	8.6%
Ships burning LNG	0
Main segment	Chemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

Stodig Ship Management AS28.3 (+69% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
Stodig Ship Management AS	9	28.3	+69%	59	11.7	3,734	9.5%	–
Segment median		16.7	0%

Ro-ro

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 97.5

Stodig Ship Management AS116 (+19% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
Stodig Ship Management AS	2	116	+19%	53	11.7	5,825	5.7%	–
Segment median		97.5	0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

	Verifiers (ships)	A · delivery notes	B · tank monitoring	C · flow meters	D · direct
Stodig Ship Management AS	DNV (11)	0%	100%	0%	0%

Stodig Ship Management AS: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

Ship	IMO	Segment	CO₂ per transport work	Size-band median	vs median	Speed kn	CO₂	Allowances
TRANS IBERIA	9170597	Chemical tanker	29.3 g CO₂/t·nm	23.7	+24%	13.1	12,294 t	€262k
TRANS CATALONIA	9176694	Chemical tanker	42.3 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	+2%	13.3	9,177 t	€154k
TRANS SEA	9956927	Chemical tanker	22.9 g CO₂/t·nm	23.7	−3%	11.0	8,213 t	€217k
TRANS FJORD	9956939	Chemical tanker	22.7 g CO₂/t·nm	23.7	−4%	11.6	7,100 t	€164k
TRANS EMERALD	9295452	Chemical tanker	37.9 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	−8%	11.6	8,355 t	€239k
TRANS TIND	9594054	Chemical tanker	21.3 g CO₂/t·nm	23.7	−10%	11.4	7,236 t	€168k
TRANS EXETER	9314753	Chemical tanker	34.6 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	−16%	11.5	7,152 t	€197k
TRANS ADRIATIC	9263928	Chemical tanker	28.3 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	−31%	11.3	6,736 t	€193k
SC CONNECTOR	9131993	Ro-ro	63.8 g CO₂/t·nm	105	−39%	11.0	12,720 t	€305k
TRANS CHEMICA	9314715	Chemical tanker	22.8 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	−45%	11.2	7,141 t	€191k
SEA-CARGO EXPRESS	9358060	Ro-ro	169 g CO₂/t·nm	310	−46%	12.5	10,517 t	€255k

30 of 11 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.