Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

HOEGH TRADER

IMO: 9171280
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 8,755 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.09 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hoegh Autoliners Management AS

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,342 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

143

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (+37%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

53.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 59.0 (−9%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.2 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,303 t

CO₂ emitted

16,630 t

Distance sailed

37,132 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,891 h

120 days, 33% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 97.2 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−3%)

79.6Ranks 213 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 14.4 (−6%)

12.0Faster than 33% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−37%)

34.7Ranks 52 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports33%
From the EU37%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,109 t

6.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HOEGH TRADER
Vehicle carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HOEGH TRADER
Vehicle carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HOEGH TRADER
Vehicle carrier median

0.0100200300400

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−1%	−8%	+261%	−90%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−12%	−10%	−85%	+614%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−6%	−4%	−39%	+29%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+2%	+6%	+44%	−32%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	+21%	+35%	+221%	+3%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	−32%	−37%	−71%	−1%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	+40%	+60%	+1,983%	+79%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	1,570	4,914	16,161	1,187	13.6	97.2	34.7	–
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	441	1,390	4,476	307	14.6	98.6	345	–
2023	not published	3,433	10,739	30,634	2,139	14.3	112	48.3	–
2022	not published	5,914	18,514	49,816	3,556	14.0	119	37.4	–
2021	not published	4,044	12,681	34,646	2,580	13.4	117	55.1	–
2020	not published	1,044	3,306	10,782	901	12.0	96.8	53.3	–
2019	not published	5,303	16,630	37,132	2,891	12.8	143	53.7	–
2018	not published	182	568	1,783	159	11.2	102	29.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	34.7	55.4	−37%	52 of 506	DNV	C
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	345	55.3	+524%	327 of 335	DNV	C
2023	not published	48.3	56.6	−15%	129 of 417	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	37.4	57.7	−35%	28 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	55.1	59.6	−7%	190 of 459	DNV	A
2020	not published	53.3	57.3	−7%	196 of 449	DNV	A
2019	not published	53.7	59.0	−9%	163 of 426	DNV	A
2018	not published	29.9	62.4	−52%	7 of 434	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.