Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

EUROCARGO SALERNO

IMO: 9175494
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,041 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EIV 19.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,041 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

108.6 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 105.9 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

166

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 97.53 (+70%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Ro-ro median 14.5 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,032 t

CO₂ emitted

21,955 t

22,300 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

64,754 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,152 h

215 days, 59% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2024

Set against all 220 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 108.6 kg/nm · median 105.9 (+3%)

59.5Ranks 118 of 220, lowest first146.1

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 14.5 (−13%)

10.4Faster than 25% of ro-ro ships17.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 166.12 g CO₂/t·nm · median 97.53 (+70%)

50.69Ranks 161 of 220, lowest first309.34

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU43%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU3%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (13,177 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EUROCARGO SALERNO
Ro-ro median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

EUROCARGO SALERNO
Ro-ro median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EUROCARGO SALERNO
Ro-ro median

50.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+5%	+9%	+0%	+7%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.8 kn	−2%	−15%	−6%	+36%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	+3%	+10%	−8%	+15%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	−0%	−10%	−8%	+38%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	−9%	+1%	+7%	−28%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.1 kn	−25%	−36%	−2%	−44%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	3,238	10,158	29,906	2,374	12.6	108.3	203.85	–
2024	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	7,032	21,955	64,754	5,152	12.6	108.6	166.12	–
2023	not published	6,654	20,764	64,610	5,332	12.1	103.0	155.65	–
2022	not published	7,270	22,725	68,973	4,957	13.9	105.4	114.25	100%
2021	not published	7,671	24,220	74,849	5,736	13.0	102.5	99.65	100%
2020	not published	8,354	26,370	81,390	5,635	14.4	102.7	72.42	100%
2019	not published	8,564	26,759	75,742	5,848	13.0	113.1	100.76	100%
2018	not published	11,577	36,113	77,131	5,098	15.1	150.1	180.84	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2024	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	166.12	97.53	+70%	161 of 220	RINA	A
2023	not published	155.65	108.62	+43%	147 of 221	RINA	A
2022	not published	114.25	90.62	+26%	138 of 223	RINA	A
2021	not published	99.65	103.64	−4%	104 of 219	RINA	A
2020	not published	72.42	102.77	−30%	64 of 238	RINA	A
2019	not published	100.76	90.89	+11%	153 of 271	RINA	A
2018	not published	180.84	91.03	+99%	210 of 260	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.