Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

HOEGH TRANSPORTER

IMO: 9176395
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 8,550 t
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.08 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hoegh Autoliners Management AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,550 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

94.4 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (−38%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,346 t

CO₂ emitted

10,471 t

10,635 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

35,456 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,485 h

104 days, 28% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 94.4 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−6%)

79.6Ranks 166 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 14.3 kn · median 14.4 (−1%)

12.0Faster than 48% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (−38%)

34.70Ranks 50 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU19%
Into the EU76%
At berth in the EU2%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,483 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HOEGH TRANSPORTER
Vehicle carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HOEGH TRANSPORTER
Vehicle carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HOEGH TRANSPORTER
Vehicle carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+5%	+5%	+18%	−70%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.8 kn	+0%	+15%	−28%	+131%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	−8%	−17%	+52%	−18%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−4%	−6%	−27%	+46%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+6.8 kn	−2%	+88%	+58%	−39%	6.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−5.8 kn	−10%	−50%	−3%	+17%	5.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+7%	+8%	−31%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	3,346	10,471	35,456	2,485	14.3	94.4	34.54	–
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	2,699	8,455	30,015	2,100	14.3	89.9	114.09	–
2023	not published	3,723	11,672	41,504	3,330	12.5	89.7	49.37	–
2022	not published	2,676	8,381	27,343	1,982	13.8	97.9	60.32	–
2021	not published	3,844	12,036	37,627	2,690	14.0	102.2	41.43	–
2020	not published	2,486	7,825	23,804	3,286	7.2	104.4	67.61	–
2019	not published	2,850	8,939	24,552	1,894	13.0	116.1	57.78	–
2018	not published	3,831	11,992	35,462	2,762	12.8	108.0	51.22	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	34.54	55.36	−38%	50 of 506	DNV	B+C
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	114.09	55.31	+106%	288 of 335	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	49.37	56.64	−13%	140 of 417	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	60.32	57.66	+5%	251 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	41.43	59.57	−30%	50 of 459	DNV	A
2020	not published	67.61	57.26	+18%	294 of 449	DNV	A
2019	not published	57.78	58.95	−2%	206 of 426	DNV	A
2018	not published	51.22	62.35	−18%	91 of 434	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.